I know I often mention how much I appreciate the pervasive spiritual focus in India, which is lacking in the west. It’s such a general statement to make though. So, today, I’m happy to be able to give an example of what I’m referring to. Today is Guru Purnima. A day that’s devoted to acknowledging and giving thanks to a special spiritual teacher (if you have one), or anyone who has taught you important lessons in life.
Even if you don’t follow a spiritual guru, you can still celebrate Guru Purnima by simply spending time reviewing all the knowledge you’ve acquired in the last year, and the way it’s transformed you.
So, what am I thinking about today?
Further on from my recent ponderings about Individual Vs Collective Culture and which one might be more suitable for me to live in, I’ve come to the realisation that it really doesn’t matter!
Why?
I recently read a new spiritual book called Seeing, Knowing, Being by John Greer. While the concepts in weren’t new to me, the way they’ve been brought together and presented prompted me to refocus my thinking.
The premise of the book is that we need to awaken ourselves and learn to see in a different way. This means detaching ourselves from our society’s version of reality, our cultural conditioning, and the identity that we have created for ourselves. The goal is to develop awareness that we’re all part of the same greater whole, unlimited by conceptions of who we are. When we gain this awareness, it enables us to see everything as divine creations of life, without being distorted by attachment or aversion, or coloured by preferences and opinions.
Put this way, “it’s our way of seeing the world that causes suffering, not the world itself”.
What I really liked about the book is how it lays out the human spiritual experience as a progression of “exile” from our true being to “return” to wholeness, and the concepts it involves. Poignant metaphors are used to help the reader understand the concepts better.
As the book explains, our “exile” starts from years of perceptions and conditioning, which creates a world of endless divisions. From an early age, we’re taught to see the same reality as everyone else in our family and our community. This leads to us as seeing ourselves as separate from other people. Racial stereotypes, religious fundamentalism, and nationalistic fevour result.
Yet, what’s worse in western individualistic society, is that we’ve replaced the feelings of safety and connection from close relationships, with anonymity and independence. We constantly want to be ourselves and seek out an authentic life, but never seem to find lasting satisfaction. We see ourselves as alone and incomplete. We feel like our lives are missing something, and we yearn for wholeness.
From here, many people are prompted to embark on a journey of seeking and transformation. A journey that necessitates letting go of fixed ideas and beliefs to rediscover our true selves. That is, the source from which we came.
When I moved to India, I wondered — like some of my friends and family did — if I was “running away”. However, as mentioned in the book, we must relinquish the conventional image of our self in order to realise the wholeness of our true nature. And, what better way to do that than changing our environment. Our entire lives revolve around the entity we believe ourselves to be, and what others believe us to be. We have so many attachments that control us, from beliefs to habits to material things. For me, immersing myself in an unfamiliar culture has facilitated them falling away and the gaining of new perspectives.
Very little of my old self exists in India, including my previous profession (did I really once write reports on public sector corporate governance, and government finances?), what I wear, and what I eat. And on a deeper level, being surrounded by people with a very different set of beliefs and behaviours has challenged my way of thinking. I identify less with who I was. At times it’s been a painful and lonely, but necessary, process to get rid of my self centered view of life. At the same time, it also feels so liberating, to no longer be restricted to my own narrow cultural conditioning.
As part of the journey to awareness, the book discusses various spiritual paths and their practices, and how they facilitate our quest for spiritual truth. It distinguishes between religious doctrines that seek to translate life’s suffering and problems into a form that gives meaning and hope, and other esoteric forms of spiritual expression that act to transform the individual and bring about insights into the nature of life and existence.
This has helped me see why I’ve never wanted to be a part of mainstream religion, especially religion that promotes itself as being the best path, to the exclusion of others. To me, following religious dogma and the set ideals of right and wrong is not going to help me progress spiritually. However, learning to see things a different way and breaking down illusion might.
Studying Reiki, experiencing past life regression, practicing Vipassana meditation, and even taking a huge leap of faith and coming to India, have all brought huge shifts in my beliefs. I’ve grown to realise that like everything in the universe, we’re all energy vibrating at certain levels, and we come to earth in many varied identities over many lifetimes. With this realisation, even the prospect of fear of death recedes (in fact, sometimes it even feels appealing, to discover what the after life and next life may bring).
Maintaining such a level of awareness is really difficult though. My mind reverts to the logic and conceptual thought that’s emphasised in modern society. Much of the time, I fear my death and everyone else’s. I still fall prey to the illusion of myself as separate and isolated. I compete and compare myself with others. And, I still find myself readily getting wound up in life’s everyday problems, rather then viewing them neutrally as a part of life to be experienced.
Fortunately, reading the book has given me a nudge back in a more enlightened direction. Really, it doesn’t matter where I’m living, as long as I’m working on my spiritual development. While India is a more inspiring and supportive place to do this than the west, the challenge is to not be overwhelmed by the difficulties of day to day life but rather use them “as a way to help motivate us to turn our attention within towards our Soul, where true fulfillment lies”. (Thank you to one of my readers who contributed this little bit of wisdom in a comment on another post).
Happy Guru Purnima everyone! I’d love to know what you’ve learned this year.
Photo credit: Two paths by Renaudeh.
© 2012, Diary of a White Indian Housewife. All rights reserved. Do not copy and reproduce text or images without permission.
Related Posts You May Like:
PLAN YOUR TRIP WITH 1500+ TRAVEL PARTNERS, 100% CUSTOMISED
















{ 210 comments… read them below or add one }
Hi Sharrel,
You somewhere mentioned that you come from a small town near Melbourne. You are probably used to a simple lifestyle back in your country which helped you to adjust in India. On the oneness of mankind the great Sikh Guru Guru Nanak wrote:
At the very beginning god created light,
the entire universe emerged out of that same light,
Oh, Who is good? Who is bad?
We are children of the same god
The Indian philosophy has always concentrated on striking a balance between the spiritual and material world. It is probably why India provides peace to everyone, even to those who do not venture to seek it. There is something for everyone.
Yeah, there are only around 10,000 people in the nearest town to where my parents live! For sure, in some ways it’s really helped. People are down to earth, no pretenses. And, I sure don’t mind a bit of dirt, and wild animals.
In other ways, growing up in a rural area was a hindrance, due to people’s lack of worldly understanding there. They just know what they’re familiar with, and that’s that. In addition, being around so many people in India freaks me out from time to time, along with all the noise. Back home, there’s utter solitude, and it’s possible to go for days without seeing anyone!
ASG, here’s where I grew up! http://www.whiteindianhousewife.com/2009/11/looking-out-my-front-door-in-australia/
Lovely pics,
The spiritual liberation that you talked about is very much part of Hinduism. The unique thing about Hinduism is that you can practice certain aspects of Hinduism liken Yoga and Vipassana and still retain you original religious views (i.e. if you have any). There is no pre- condition that you need to convert to have a spiritual experience. This flexibility is the inherent beauty of Hinduism.
BTW, I understand that you were a govt. servant in your country. That partly explains your adaptability. Babus all over the world have a relaxed and adaptable attitude.
Oh gosh, you called me a babu!!
That actually made me laugh. Well, yes, I guess I was! I worked in the equivalent of your Comptroller and Auditor General of India office. We wielded the whip on the government departments (I think it’s contributed a lot to my frustrations with the goings on in the government in India, because I know how things *** should*** operate).
“Attachment to views is the greatest impediment to the spiritual path.”
― Thich Nhat Hanh, Old Path White Clouds: Walking in the Footsteps of the Buddha
(One of my favorite authors)
Why don’t you get into local politic Sharell ? Your knowledge and experience could prove very useful.
But I cant stand politicians! Having to have them as colleagues would really affect my mental health!
Besides, in India, I’m not allowed. Apart from the fact that I’m not a citizen, I doubt anyone would elect me. People tend to vote for politicians that belong to their caste — some of them even have a criminal record, but it doesn’t matter. Ugh, not anything I want to get involved in.
Yes but you look like a movie star and you look good with a moustache so maybe one day…
“I doubt anyone would elect me. People tend to vote for politicians that belong to their caste.”
Yeah ! But they are open to foreigners.
Refer to Antonia Maino, mother of Raul Ghandi and wife of Rajeev Ghandi.
But she married into a political family and they needed someone to carry it on after her husband died, na?
OK. Then you kill her and carry on the legacy of gories in India.
I think there are two qualities which made you tick in India. Firstly, your simple upbringing helped you adjust to the chaos of India. Secondly, you being an ex-govt servant understand bureaucracy, bureaucratic delays and have more tolerance for it. These two qualities are more than adequate for surviving in India.
Are you sure Australian bureaucracy can match up its Indian counterparts?
Ha! I don’t think so. I’ll give you an example. Last time I was back in Australia, I had to renew my driver’s license. I wanted to change it from a 3 year license to a 10 year license, and I also had to get a new photo for it. It must’ve taken me a whole 10 minutes in total to do — and that was the time taken to ring them up and ask them to change it from 3 to 10 years (which they did straight away in their system), pay for the new license by credit card over the phone, and then go into one of their branches, take a ticket, wait in line, and then get an electronic photo and give them an electronic signature. New license came in the mail within 5 working days!
I shudder to think what would’ve happened in India. It probably would’ve taken me half a day (including being hung up on numerous times, and having to submit a tonne of paper work, and probably go and get a demand draft to pay them as well)!
Hi Sharrel
Even I got my driving licence in five working days. Thing have improved a lot these days. However, trasnport offices are happy hunting grounds for touts where they co exist with the officials in a mutually beneficial relationship. In India, goverment offices provide for an eco system where all kinds of creatures can prosper.
That’s an amusing way of putting it!
In India it wouldn’t have taken anything. I got my driving license without even seeing the face of RTO office or building. Its about making most of the system. I got my Passport in ONE day. Many are still waiting after three months. It depends.
Australia is far behind in government entertainment.
Well, of course I wasn’t factoring in going the greasy palms route!
Wonderful! Just really beautifully written Sharell.
When I read your book I was struck by just how lost and conditioned you seemed in your “previous” life and relationship and how sad it made you. You are a seeker, a wanderer in many ways and this mentality goes against the norm and it creates confusion and loneliness. You’re running away, escaping and so on…maybe you are just trying to make sense and finding what is truly in your heart.
You have to crumble and hurt before you can transform into the new you and understand your own unique path in life…life is after all a mystery to us all….
I come to think of one of my favorite Swedish poets, the late Karen Boye when i read this and my favorite poem “Yes, of course it hurts”
Yes, of course it hurts when buds are breaking.
Why else would the springtime falter?
Why would all our ardent longing
bind itself in frozen, bitter pallor?
After all, the bud was covered all the winter.
What new thing is it that bursts and wears?
Yes, of course it hurts when buds are breaking,
hurts for that which grow
and that which bars.
Yes, it is hard when drops are falling.
Trembling with fear, and heavy hanging,
cleaving to the twig, and swelling, sliding -
weight draws them down, though they go on clinging.
Hard to be uncertain, afraid and divided,
hard to feel the depths attract and call,
yet sit fast and merely tremble -
hard to want to stay
and want to fall.
Then, when things are worst and nothing helps
the tree’s buds break as in rejoicing,
then, when no fear holds back any longer,
down in glitter go the twig’s drops plunging,
forget that they were frightened by the new,
forget their fear before the flight unfurled -
feel for a second their greatest safety,
rest in that trust
that creates the world.
Wow, that poem is beautiful, so enchanting and meaningful. Thanks so much for sharing it.
Yes, it’s clear looking back how much my old life wasn’t working for me, but how much this one is. I still remember way back years ago when my CPA (Certified Practicing Accountant) membership came up for renewal, and I decided to let it expire — 5 years of work and study it took me earn it! And I threw it away. But I wanted to give the universe a clear message that I never wanted to work as an accountant again, and to open the door for more suitable opportunities. All those darn rules and regulations. Enough of it all!
Thankfully, it worked (and I don’t know how, but I was brave enough to take the chance and move to India for it)! And what a journey it’s been.
“Twenty years from now you will be more disappointed by the things that you didn’t do than by the ones you did do. So throw off the bowlines. Sail away from the safe harbor. Catch the trade winds in your sails. Explore. Dream. Discover.”
-Mark Twain
Works for me!!!!
Wise words, for sure!
A great post Sharell. I too have made the big move to India recently and really related to your individual v/s collective post and infact am just reading the Being Indian book that you suggested – it really is quite enlightening. With my move, I have learnt that you need to keep an open mind and accept the new culture for what it is. If you try to keep one foot in one country and another in the new country it is very hard to make progress and feel content. Also, being positive plays a big part in how spiritually complete you feel.
Welcome to India, and the remarkable journey that it will take you on! You’ve already got a head start by reading that book. I wish I’d come across it much earlier, after spending so much time scratching my head and getting frustrated. It really sounds like you have the right attitude to enjoy India and do well here.
@Sharell
“Yes, it’s clear looking back how much my old life wasn’t working for me, but how much this one is. I still remember way back years ago when my CPA (Certified Practicing Accountant) membership came up for renewal, and I decided to let it expire — 5 years of work and study it took me earn it! And I threw it away. But I wanted to give the universe a clear message that I never wanted to work as an accountant again, and to open the door for more suitable opportunities. All those darn rules and regulations. Enough of it all! Thankfully, it worked (and I don’t know how, but I was brave enough to take the chance and move to India for it)! And what a journey it’s been.”
This is bravery and you’ve hurt but also been rewarded enormously. I can’t wait for your next book as i think it will be a very different story. I loved reading your book but it also made me a bit sad as you were struggling so much and i am in the same situation!!!!
I love your new outlook and look forward to more of your posts, spread the love and share the beauty you’re feeling now
Pritish Nandy is my favorite man in India right now, I think he speaks a true voice that is sometimes hard to find here when all is focused on entertainment and scandals..
http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/extraordinaryissue/entry/everybody-hurts
Unfortunately, struggles are necessary so we can evolve, to get the best rewards at the end. And the great thing about humans is that they forget a lot of the pain after it’s over. All those struggles of mine feel like a distant memory now. More so, that phase feels like an inspiring time of transformation. Sometimes, I wistfully dream of the start of my Indian odyssey when everything was so raw, and also full of potential. So, hang in there, it gets easier and easier! And then, you’ll be able to marvel over it all later.
Oh, I remember reading one of Pritesh Nandy’s articles, about Why I Love Mumbai. The article you’ve linked to is a really good one. Excellent food for thought. I’ve subscribed to his blog now.
If I translate your post to recent teachings I received I would say nothing is permanent, ego itself is not permanent. (However, many teachers have warned western students that you should not try to drop ego before you find it or you may find your self in a mental illness situation and scare your consulate).
It is not India that has changed you, change is the very nature of Life. Refusing to accept change causes suffering.
And sorry, no, IMO West is not less supportive than India for the spiritual seeker, just as it is not a worst place to raise children in general. But it is maybe a place that is better for you, at this time.
This has to be my favourite among your posts, Sharell! So well written, I feel like it’s very timely for my life. Keep living your destiny. xx
>> I know I often mention how much I appreciate the pervasive spiritual focus in India.
I have been a long time lurker on this blog, I can’t help myself from delurking and comment now.
I never understood what you meant by “pervasive spiritual focus in India” or statements of that sort. Is it the easy access to Vipassana and other such spiritual practices in India? Don’t tell me you find Indians very spiritual. Anyway, my experience in India is completely different. I am an Indian & Hindu and have been living in India for last 3 years after having lived close to 10 years in USA. I was spiritual before coming to India but now I am on verge of becoming an atheist (I have not lost my morality though) after living here and interacting with people especially with so called religious/spiritual people. I find compared to USA there is a lack of morals (honesty, being considerate towards others, treating others with respect, social egalitarianism etc) in India and then there is unapologetic group-ism. Now I am coming to believe that more religious a person is, the more immoral that person will be, at least if the person is Hindu. Based on my interaction with few Muslims I find them more honest and trust worthy, I have not interacted with any Christians in India though to say anything about them.
Hi KK, funnily enough, I did my Vipassana meditation course in Australia. I also did Art of Living in Australia! What I mean is that there is a closer connection to the divine in India — spirituality is a part of every day life. Everyone believes in something bigger than themselves — and they believe so passionately and connect with it every day.
What you refer to is yet another paradox of India, the way I see it.
And, I guess it’s like a lot of things in India — you have to get the strength to look past the negatives/failings, in order to see the beauty underneath.
I find that Hindu beliefs (about mind, body, and spirit) resonate with me, but as to people’s individual behaviour — well, I agree, it often leaves a lot to be desired. I do feel that there is a big gap between how they should be behaving in regards to their religion, and how they do behave. Apart from the dishonestly and selfish behaviour, I’ve seen plenty of corruption at temples. In fact, I find visiting large and popular temples very disheartening — everything from the money grabbing pandits to the pushy pilgrims.
I wrote a post about it here: http://www.whiteindianhousewife.com/2011/05/spirituality-vs-commercialism-in-india/
I’m not going to let that have a negative impact on me though, because I still believe in the principles and the teachings. It’s just that people have so many failings. I do keep my interaction with religious/spiritual people to a minimum, and prefer to explore along my own path — hence me being spiritual but not religious.
I posted this one there “Those hungry pandits are really hungry. They live in near poverty. Not like those rich christian pastors and priests in the west.”
Cause the ” social egalitarianism ” spewing folks of India feels, the Indian govt should manage monies collected in temples instead of the Hindus managing their own affairs who could then pay temple priests a decent living?
Manny, why does the Indian government handle Hindu temple affairs? Does it also handle the affairs of other places of worship like churches and mosques? If not, why not?
Is it to preserve ancient temples that would otherwise fall to ruin?
Manny , I think is talking about the impact of Dravidian movement on the temples of Tamilnadu. Darvidian movement was an iconoclasm and rationalism based movement, which was anti Brahmin and Anti north India Ideology. They made temple board, which took over temple trusts of many temples.
And no, the government would not dare do that institutionalized religious places like mosques and Churches. Some mosques are controlled by WAQF board, but don’t think its Government controlled.
Not all the temples are controlled by the temple board.
There are two sides to it. Many of the old temples were controlled by the trust. And most of these temples had huge land attached with it (given by the King and landlords), meant to make temple self sufficient.
But over the years. those lands have been occupied by the members of the temple trusts, the powerful few in the town or village. Most of Brahmin’s have changed with change in the wind, and have started exodus from Tamilnadu state.
For those, who have not been able to change fast enough or are not economically strong have been caught in a different world where they don’t have any more political or economical clout.
My friend talks about how Brahmins have become poorer. I would say that its only for those Brahmins, who refused to change and offer their service for spirituality according to the changing environment.
There has been no decline in the ashrams or gurus who have shown new marketing and delivery channel for services for spiritual needs.
Government policies have affected business too and other socio-economic institutions. Business has changed according to the changing environment.
Look at the number of Ashrams and fake Gurus that come from Tamilnadu! There are so many concentrated around Thiruvanmalai temple. You will find length and breadth of Taminadu filled with such Ashrams.
They are akin to the Mega churches of US.
Its up to Brahmanical priests to change their offerings, and use their generations of spiritual knowledge to market and sell their services. If they are not changing and still offering their services from the place where they get coins as donation instead of Bundle of notes, then only they are to be blamed for not changing.
Big temples like Tirupathi in Andhra Pradesh and the Hindus have no control over the monies collected in that temple.
“Sick ular” people of India, wants it that way… The CM of Andhra wanted to put his hands into this funds for the Railway station buildings and improvements of that state. His rationalization was that Since so many people use the railways to visit the temple, this money should be used for that. But they all pay the train tickets. Use that fund.
The “sicular” people of India feels Hindus cannot be trusted with their own funds. Only Babus of India. Indian IAS officers who maybe a christian or a Muslims or plain commie atheists can be trusted with managing these monies.
Hindu priests are paid pittance. Everyone loves to mock this poor soul in India..like he is eviI carnate of India. a Temple priest lives below poverty..his children are malnourished for the most part. They are discrimiated and reviled by the sickular Indians. Temples cannot made their own decision on infrastructure improvements in a temples. You read so many of the pilgrims being trammpled to death and what not…but they cannot on their own build wider path or buy lands for expansion of the facilities.
Recently when 4 Billion$ of Jeweles were fouind in that Travancore temple, every riff raff “Social egletarian” of India wanted to use it for “social egeletarian” purpose. Not that these funds cannot be used for any good social causes..but that is the prerogative of the temples owners..The Hindus. not some christians of Kerala or coomies of west Bengal.
Imagine in the US were the anti christians controlled the church funds. There would have been a violent revolution by now.
But in India, this is the norm. This is not about Brahmins…this is about Anti Hindu conspiracy of the sicular self titled “social egeletarians”.
It alls started with Nehru the rascal. He was an immoral cad. India was ruled my Muslims for the most part for 700 years and had to live under the tyranny of the terrorsts likle Mohammad Gazni and Mohammad Ghori and every riff raffs who came along and invaded and plundered and destroyed major Hindu temples of India and mosques built over them, Then came the Anglicans who wanted to christianize and civlize the Hindus/Indians for 300 years. Then this Nehru and his commies fielt that if Hindus now come to power, they would seek their vengences on the Muslims and others …so they did their “social egeletarian” thing if keeping the Hindus suppressed and controlled.. .for these “social egeletarians” felt they were the only ones who know what is right and what is wrong in this world”. So in the last 65 years, the communist/sickularists have again messing with Hindus,
http://frfnet.org/SaveHinduTemples.pdf
The Short answer.
No, the Indian govt is too chicken to interfere with the world wide organization of the Churches. They dare not go against them. Neither would they interfere in the affairs of the mosques. But Hindus on the other Hand, its an entititlement for them to control.
And no, its not for the purpose of the preservation of the Temples that they control. In fact, it prevents Hindus from expanding these temples or making any improvements on their own volition.
In Kerala, the Sabarimala trust lands have been taken over by christians and many churches built on them and no one can do anything about it.
“I find that Hindu beliefs (about mind, body, and spirit) resonate with me, but as to people’s individual behaviour — well, I agree, it often leaves a lot to be desired. I do feel that there is a big gap between how they should be behaving in regards to their religion, and how they do behave.”
This is due to the fact that our ideals are Lord Ram (ideal man), Sita (ideal wife) and many such divine characters. If mortals compare themselves with gods, they are invariably going to fail. This explains the gap between religion and conduct. Furthermore, Hinduism being an loose amalgam of philosophies often does not provide a guide map to its followers. This often leads other people to dismiss Hinduism as mere superstitious. This has also kept us divided and we were unable to protect against foreign invasions. It is very difficult to look beyond rituals and reach the core of Hinduism.
“This is due to the fact that our ideals are Lord Ram (ideal man), Sita (ideal wife).”
Sorry to say but I neither consider Lord Ram an ideal man or Sita and ideal wife. I won’t call anyone an Ideal man who can send his wife to jungle just because other person commented on the character of his wife.
Secondly by propagating Sita as ideal wife, all the cruel behavior she had to bear is being justified on the name of false honor. An ideal wife would be someone who refuse such nonsense request from his husband. And not submit meekly before him.
Though I consider Ram and Sita good person with good hearts but won’t call them ideal.
This is no challenge to GOD but my personal observation of the characters of Ram and Sita which are considered to be re-incarnation of Lord Vishnu and Lakshmi.
Sharell,
“What you refer to is yet another paradox of India, the way I see it.”
No its not paradox of India but its inability of such people to tackle the change in their life. They have nothing to blame so Hindus are soft targets. Because no matter how much they abuse Hindus, nobody would care. Say a damn thing about Muslims and you are damned.
Thanks for the reply. Sorry, I still don’t get you; but that doesn’t matter, all that matters is you found some spirituality in India.
Indians are mostly religious than spiritual. It is true that most people in India believe in God/supernatural but most of them consider God as their own personal God or a friend who will show favoritism towards them disregarding all their failings/sins & disregarding other human beings; it is like there is an expectation of nepotism, if you will, even from God.
I know or interact daily with people of not-so-great moral character who keep fast a specific day every week, who hang dozens of pictures of Gods on their office walls , who have bhajans for ring tones, who make pilgrimages to some famous temple every few months, etc.
For me a person’s behavior mirrors his or her spirituality. A spiritual person can’t be an immoral person.
Btw, Art of living, Isha yoga and other such spiritual practices are based on Advaitha philosophy (everything/creation is God), very few folks in India follow this philosophy, it is Dvaitha philosophy (God is different from individual) that most Indians follow albeit unknowingly because it is simple to practice.
A clarification: My previous comment is meant for Sharell.
Thanks.
Advaitha –> Monism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monism)
Dvaitha –> Dualism (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism)
I find that Hindu beliefs (about mind, body, and spirit) resonate with me, but as to people’s individual behaviour — well, I agree, it often leaves a lot to be desired. I do feel that there is a big gap between how they should be behaving in regards to their religion, and how they do behave. Apart from the dishonestly and selfish behaviour, I’ve seen plenty of corruption at temples. In fact, I find visiting large and popular temples very disheartening — everything from the money grabbing pandits to the pushy pilgrims………….
Isn’t that true across different religions across the world in different ways ?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/29/pinehaven-christian-child_n_1388178.html
http://brokenrites.alphalink.com.au/nletter/bccrime.html
http://www.cnbc.com/id/29811628/Vatican_Pope_upset_by_stampede_in_Angola
It pains me to read the word “Hindu” being used very loosely around here.
“It pains me to read the word “Hindu” being used very loosely around here.”
I know. For me, In today’s India, Hindus are a minority. The majority in India is what I call “Riff Raffs”.
People find what Indians do and says “Hindus this and Hindus that”. The vast majority of the people in India are anti Hindu sickularists aka Riff Raffs!
What is this ” social egalitarianism ” that you and other leftist folks often talk about?
“I was spiritual before coming to India but now I am on verge of becoming an atheist”
That means that you were actually never a believer.
“Now I am coming to believe that more religious a person is, the more immoral that person will be, at least if the person is Hindu. ”
What the hell is that? How such negative generalizations are rampant about Hindus and Indians. There is Vinod who says it all time and now this.
Why these people fail to see what America and Americans are doing to this world. How many countries would they have to destroy when somebody would stand up and say-They are doing wrong.
Such type of NRI people who spent some time in America, come back and start hating India and Hindus.
WHAT IS THE ISSUES WITH THEM ?
I don’t understand what you are talking. neither do I get why you throw your tantrums.
Get used to freedom of speech. It does not mean hearing only what is pleasing to your ears and the self image.
Why did you use my name? Be specific
And show me excerpts where I have shown hatred towards India or Hindus!
What is America doing?
It is fighting terrorists, and has opened a second front against them, especially when my own country is inefficient and apathetic about its own people!
It has managed to keep oil prices down, and if the oil price is controlled by the Islamic hardliners, you would see its direct implication on country’s economy.
It has taken leadership, whenever circumstances rose. Be it Korean War or war against communism on any part of the globe. Now its engaged with another enemy Islamic terrorists.
Refer Geeta and read Mahabharat. You would learn that End justifies means, as long as it is for a just cause.
So many lives were lost in the battle of Mahabharatha, where lord Krishna was the suthradhar of the battle.
Does the cause matter or the means?
I wonder, if you have understood the meaning of being an Indian or a Hindu!
If being Hindu means to accept dominion of rituals, making characters of fables and mythology alive – without understanding the spiritual guide or the underlying philosophy, then he is as blind as any superstitious whose belief and faith is blind and incomplete.
America was not a major colonial power, they colonized Philipines. They made use of slavery for agrarian purposes just as other South American countries did. Why do you think only western Europe and US grew faster than other regions?
Why South American nations did not grow as fast as USA?
Let me briefly tell you about history of Christianity. Christianity was like Hinduism, as in both Priests were supreme. Both used language a different language than spoken by masses – Latin in Europe and Sanskrit in India.
There was a reform movement in Christianity – They started using the commoners language to print Bible. Protestant school of Christianity was born in the West. Protestant school is plural, they tolerate multiple churches, as against catholic.
It this Protestant church that propelled much of the western Europe and USA on the path of innovation and productivity driven economies.
Do you ever look inward into Hinduism? Do you take any effort to learn from history? Or do you have so much intolerance that you can’t see other perspectives!
Again you are justifying slavery and colonialism.
What is the issues with you. I have no interest in being called an Indian or a Hindu. But I can’t hear all BS about Hindus being immoral and all that every time from an NRI.
And to state this is my freedom of expression and you shouldn’t show your intolerance about it.
Slavery, Lynchings and Jim Crowe were all done by “egalitarian” Protestants” from the babel belt!
Why! Slavery and empire building exists from time human civilization started.
Do we not use word Dasa and Dasi?
So whats the big fuss about it? Slavery still exists in the world in one form or other. India had bonded labor, sexual slavery. And so does every other part of the world!
We still use slave labor in the sweat shops, brick klins, stone breaking and sexual slavery!
I never justified it!
I just countered your tirade that west has made money using slavery and Colonialism!
Why then the GDP of countries like USA and China is on rise? USA was not a major colonial power. They made use of slavery for agrarian purposes, just as other south American countries did. Where are the south American countries in terms of GDP? Do you think slavery contributed to the wealth of USA only?
USA got its wealth through Innovation and productivity. Capital, Innovation and productivity have been major contributors of wealth.
Whatever wealth colonialism made was wasted in the 2nd world war, when all productive capacity of Europe was destroyed and wealth looted.
When Europe can rebuild it in 50-60 years, why not India?
All we are doing is giving excuses for not growing. We never got it right, because we did not CHANGE with a VISION.
“Do we not use word Dasa and Dasi?”
Das is NOT equal to Slave.
Das is servant. Dasi is maid. And they are not Slave. They are compensated for their services.
Slaves were not compensated for their services. They were owned by Whites as they owned the pets. There was no difference in pets and slaves. Infact pets were better off than slaves, because pet didn’t have to do much work.
It would be a GROSS mistake to confuse DAS/DASI with slaves. Those people used to live a lavish life in Palaces and also got salary.
Even Government officers in India are called servant that doesn’t mean they are slaves.
“Refer Geeta and read Mahabharat. You would learn that End justifies means, as long as it is for a just cause.”
NO. You haven’t read Geeta carefully. In Geeta it said-
Karmanye Vadhikaraste ma faleshu Kadachan. So clearly the emphasis in on the mean not the End.
And in the case of America neither means were fair nor the end was justified.
Its not doing anything positive in the world. Its not stopping wars but starting a new one every second years. It has not controlled the oil prices but try to dictat on Arab countries over this. It has not taken leadership position because a leader never discriminates. Its has taken a selective approach while dealing with terrorism. For them only the life of Americans is precious. Doesn’t matter if 1 Million people are killed just to get one man. If this is what you call justice, you should not be talking about morals again.
Regarding taking your name at-least I am honest and frank enough to do it unlike you who always refer me indirectly in you discussion with others.
Not sure what you made of
“Karmanye Vadhikaraste ma faleshu Kadachan”
keep doing your karma without thinking about fruits it would bore.
If my karama according to my dharama of being a Khastriya is to kill, is it ok for me to keep killing without thinking about the fruits!
Not sure if your understood the gist of Geetha, where Krishna was motivating Arjuna to raise his arms against his own Guru, Brothers, Uncle, brothers and millions others who had not directly wronged against Pandavas.
Not sure, if you could make out things that Lord Krishna did to kill Bheesma, karna, Drona, Duryodhana, even his brother in law!
The fine print is that it has to be for a “Just Cause”.
Everyone has a view of what is “just” and what is “unjust”
I have personal morals, and don’t believe in defining morality for others. Especially if they are adult and accountable for their each action.
Do you know what could have happened if America had not opened second front in Afganistan! Where do you think Laboratory of Terrorist exists! India.
As long as they are fighting on the second front, less lives would be lost in India. And I don’t care what it means in terms of loss of life. And I will not be ashamed to say “yes one Indian life is equal to thousands of theirs, And i don’t care if they die.”
Not sure, why would you call me indirectly taking your name, when the reply was to your comment! REPLY to you comment means that it is directed towards YOU.
I think in “Being Indian” there is a chapter about faith and morality in India. Puritanism seems to be a christian thing, but it often comes together with hypocrisy – don’t fool yourself
“Now I am coming to believe that more religious a person is, the more immoral that person will be, at least if the person is Hindu. Based on my interaction with few Muslims I find them more honest and trust worthy, I have not interacted with any Christians in India though to say anything about them……”
KK,
I find it appalling that you didn’t think twice before grading people based on their religions. Per your post:
Most religious Hindus = Most immoral
Muslims (you haven’t qualified them under grades of religiousness) = More honest and trustworthy than religious Hindus.
Christians = Not yet analysed.
Again, it shocks me to think people can post such defamatory comments about a certain religious group abusing the anonymity the internet provides. Since you mentioned having lived in the US, let me ask you. Would you dare grade Americans the same way ? I could give you an example
Most religious Christian priests = Pedophiles (how moral is that?)
Most religious Jews = Money mongers…
Most religious Mormons = xyz
Most religious Buddhists = “whatever else?” !!!
Thats’ how the “Sickularists” of India who call themselves” Social vegetarianism” operate.
Ha ha!
That should read “Social Egalitarians” not vegetarians..
What are you thinking Manny!!?
It was the spell check suggestion that I clicked.
Ha Ha!
KK, I am a white American Hindu and feel that if the Indian people do not start becoming PROUD of the great spiritual and intellectual accomplishments of the ancient Hindus that us non-Indians who have taken to Hinduism will carry forth the legacy amply.
That being said, I have met many very serious and sincere Indian Hindus who have good morals and ethics. Maybe its just one out of 1,000 or even 1 out of 10,000 but that’s still a lot because there are so many of you.
KK, don’t worry. Hinduism is gaining ground in the West and I feel it is we who will carry forth the pristine intellectual rigor of ancient Hindu philosophy, as well as its lofty ethics. That being said, I have met many sincere Indian Hindus who are moral and ethical. It may be just 1 out of 1,000 or even 1 out of 10,000, but there are so many of you that even that ratio turns out be a lot.
Don’t give up on Hinduism. You will not find a more philosophically rigorous tradition anywhere.
What a lovely post! You ask the question about what we’ve learned the past year. I think, for me, it is the realization of the boundaries I’ve placed in my own life, and, how I might choose to redefine them moving forward. A change in perspective can be everything!
Edison once said Hinduism is 99% superstition an 1% inspiration.I am disappointed to learn that you haven’t figured that out by now Sharrell.Christ weeps !
Since I was never christened/baptised, I don’t think Christ views me very favourably anyway.
A jealous (character flaw) god looking at you unfavorably at you is a good thing!
And why Sharell have to believe Edison other than thanking him for inventing bulb.
Cause, without the electric bulb we would all be watching TV with candle lights!
India did manage to give acute snapshot of human suffering to Prince Sidharatha, and propelled him to find the answer as to “Why suffering exists on Earth”. his quest resulted in his eternal bliss and nirvana.
It continues to show the same snapshot even today – of human suffering and misery. But it has not resulted in more men venturing into the spiritual quest of finding their answer.
India still is the great destination for spiritual quest as it throws you many choices or paths for this quest and journey.
Over the centuries, most have acquired beliefs from others, instead of walking the path of spiritual quest and finding their truth or belief.
Spirituality has been confused with social and communal rituals centered around place of worship. I understand sanskrit, and I know that most of the temple rituals is focused on humanizing deity. Rituals like waking him up, bathing him, feeding him, letting him sleep…..and the offerings to the deity. Rituals can’t be a path to spiritual awakening. I still like going to temples, because it has positive vibes, positive thoughts and a tranquil environment to meditate.
Belief is very powerful and can be propagated. Its the belief that makes people hook and pierce their bodies, make their bodies bloody, endure pain like Christ or simply blow themselves.
I believe in the four symbolic stages of life. The second last is to contemplate and slowly detach one from everything. The last one is jump in a path with objective of spiritual salvation.
@Vinod. I once read that in hinduism there are many different ways to express one’s faith and that no one is better than the other. Meditating, chanting mantras, helping your neighbours or taking care of deity like a baby are all as noble in the eye of the Gods. I thought this was very touching. There exist many spiritual stories where God in fact holds a special tenderness to the “naive” worships which come from the heart, rather than the head.
As for ritual, they are a technique ; through repetition, constant practice, you can access illumination.
I believe in full counsciousness in every stage and age
Yes Hinduism is all Inclusive religion. The basic crux is that God favors his search, in the form of penance, meditation or even karama. He does not distinguish between evil and good and gives boon to anyone who tries.
I see science also as a form of the search. Some of the concepts can be extrapolated into the spiritual domain. If life is a type of energy, then it can’t be created or destroyed. It can be only modified.
Science can explain how cells aggregated and formed multi-cellular forms. it also explains how the genetic code determines mitosis and meiosis driven creation of cells. But all this is hardware of life.
There are many questions that have not been answered yet. What is consciousness? What life form starts getting consciousness? I know Gorrilas and chimps have self awareness and consciousness. I have seen cat feeding baby squirrel and a dog feeding kittens. So do they have empathy? What is this circuitry of neural network, distribution of electromagnetic fields that creates us life? What happens to all the data that is stored in our brain as record to our lives? Who switches us on and switches us off? What happens to the collective memory? Do my emotions resonate in the environment as an electromagnetic wave? Does it interferes with others electromagnetic fields of other humans?
There ae so many things that we don’t know. We try to find the answer based on how far we can see and that depends on our collective knowledge. it depends on the limitation of our senses and dimensions it can perceive.
Hinduism would accept this approach being all inclusive. Semitic religions will not! For them its either my way or highway.
“Yes Hinduism is all Inclusive religion.”
really?
that’s why my friends who are white but Hindu can not go into the inner sanctum of a temple in India, yet my Indian friends who are Christian or atheist are allowed in, no problem!
Hinduism is not defined by the rituals or controls in the place of worship.
In north India, the Bhakthi movement have defined how the temples work. The Aarthees are in the local language and one can go actually touch the feet of the deity in the inner sanctum.
But thats not the case with the temples in the south, where entry into the inner sanctum is strictly controlled, and rituals are usually in Sanskrit, a language not spoken by the commoners.
There is no uniform rules as there is no single institution for Hinduism. Every temple formulates its rules. Some don’t allow menstruating women inside the temple. Some don’t allow folks with stitched clothes in. Some don’t allow untouchables or lower castes into the temple.
And you would see all kind of rituals – ranging from fire walking to throwing babies, burying them temporarily.
What you are talking about is Brahmanism, which was popularly presented as Hinduism by the Semitic rulers.
According to Hindu Philosophy, any pursuing his karma(work) is doing his divine duty. based on this core philosophy, any supposedly lower caste person can not be unholy because he is doing his karma. The entire premise of untouchability falls. A person can be unclean, but can become clean by bathing.
There is a story of Sakaracharya, it is said that when he left his body to enter body of a king to experience grahasth perspective, a person was brought to the court with allegation that he was trying to read Veda.
Sankaracharya as the king, ruled that the man is trying to become a Brahman, and that’s not a crime. Veda mentions classification system based on the karma. It was never birth based.
An untouchable lower caste man could become Brahman by reading Vedas. His karma decided his position in the classification system.
You have temples like ISKCON, where a white person can go inside the inner sanctum.
Hinduism is truly a pluralistic and inclusive religion in its purest form. And temples are only one aspect of that religion. The real temple is the body and mind. One should be able to search god within himself. God is there in all his creation and omnipresent.
And its difficult to reform this religion as each temple, each akhara or Ashram will have different rule book.
I don’t think practice of rituals makes one closer to their spiritual goal. It just makes them more efficient in those rituals.
What is more important is that drive for searching spiritual enlightenment.
Once the disciple asked his Zen guru, as to how should he find enlightenment. His Zen guru did not answer and just smiled. they were crossing a steam later that day, when the Guru, pushed his disciple into the water. The disciple struggled to breath and was nearly drowned.
The guru’s explanation was that seek and want enlightenment as bad as you wanted to breath. You will find it.
A blind routine of rituals without seeking him is not going to help.
I remember another story, Narada sage considered himself as the greatest devotee of lord Vishnu. He asked him so.
Vishnu chuckled and remarked that there is another devotee greater than him. He showed him a farmer who was tilling his land and would chant “Narayana” in between.
Narada was puzzled, as to how that man is a greater devotee than himself. Lord Vishnu gave him a work of carrying an earthen pitcher on his head. He should not touch it and not a drop of water should spill. Narada was focused on his task. At the end of it, Vishnu asked “How many times did you call my name while doing the task”
Even doing your karma is a valid path of spirituality, as long as you seek the enlightenment.
One need not be a monk, and be a detached sanyasee in a conjugal relationship and yet seek enlightenment.
There are many paths to reach there. Some take you faster, some slow.
@Vinod. I agree with you. And then as a famous guru says “after the ecstasy, the laundry”
Interesting post. I think internalizing culture is a constant, automatic process. I wonder if it’s possible to detach oneself from cultural conditioning. Maybe it’s enough to admit one’s biases from cultural conditioning.
You were a CPA? Okay, you have really, really grown — even though I read your book, I honestly never realized you’d locked yourself that deeply into the world of numbers! Most CPAs I’ve known have been very self-limiting people, as if they’ve imposed their profession on their personality. You’ve moved so far beyond that type of self that if I didn’t know, it would be just about the *last* thing I would have thought you’d done!
Anyway, back to your question. What have I learned this past year? I’ve had to learn a whole lot of self-acceptance. I have some physical problems that not only cause me chronic pain, but also limit my ability to walk beyond very short distances. I was never athletic, but I used to love to move, to hike, to walk and walk quickly! Now I walk slowly, usually with a lot of pain, and have to stop regularly. As a result, it’s forced me to re-think my whole sense of self. It sounds like such a small thing, but it’s a massive change in one’s life — imagine if you could never walk more than 200 meters at one stretch again. It’s forced me to rearrange most of my external world. But I’ve also tried to remember not only what I *can’t* do any longer but what I *can* — and also my husband’s many small kindnesses; he does almost all the shopping now, for instance, and runs almost all my errands for me to save me pain. A good man is a wonderful thing to have.
My creative energies these days run into smaller activities; for example, I keep my whole family supplied with handknitted socks these days. Fortunately, knitting only involves the hands and brain, and both of those still work fine.
My grandmother, who lived to 103, was my best teacher in gracefully accepting what life hands you; she did a wonderful job of rearranging her life to accommodate her increasing physical frailty. By the end, she was nearly deaf and nearly blind, but her mind was still 100% and she was just a joy to be around. A favorite memory is that she once admitted to me, when she was in her late 80s, “Every time I look in the mirror and see that old woman looking back at me, I’m surprised — because I still feel like a 15-year-old girl inside.” I’ve tried to hang onto my inner 15-year-old, too (without all the teenage angst!), it’s a great way to always stay young inside even if I’m not on the outside any more.
Most of all, however, I find myself still best described by how a friend of mine described herself to me a few years ago: I’m still trying to decide what I want to be when I grow up!
Thanks for a thought-provoking post and for sharing your spiritual journey. You’re in a place where I suspect it’s a lot easier to do than in this materialistic Western society I live in (and you came from), but it’s something I think we all should do wherever we are. Simply put, I believe it makes us better people.
Hi Laura,
Yeah, I started off as a financial auditor. I hated that subject (auditing) at university, but the economy wasn’t good when I finished studying, so I took the first job that came along. Ugh, their personality was all over their profession. That was one of the toughest things to deal with — spending time in that environment day in, day out, and having to try and relate to them. Thankfully I had some great bosses that I got along with really well (and who used to also dislike people’s mentalities). That made spending time in the office almost bearable! When I was studying, accounting wasn’t a bad career choice for me — it’s just that my personality hadn’t had the chance to develop and grow. When I was young, I was very much devoted to my studies (nerdy even!) and I did really well at commerce, so it seemed like a logical choice. I’d buried my creativity during my secondary school years.
Wow, thanks for sharing so much about what you’re dealing with. That is a massive challenge to overcome. I can imagine it would be very confronting as well as obviously painful. We just never know what life has in store for us/is going to throw at us. So glad to hear that you have supportive people around you, especially your husband.
I was also interested to read your comments regarding ageing. I’ve often wondered what will go on inside my mind and how I’ll deal with the whole process. Your grandmother sounds like a very inspirational woman.
Hi Sharell!
I have been following your blog for quite some time and I just wanted to thank you for all of your insights and observations surrounding Indian culture. I am half Puerto Rican and half Dutch and in an intercultural marriage. My husband is Indian and his family is from Maharashtra, however he moved from India when he was 5 years old and grew up in a few different countries before settling in the US where we live. He actually graduated high school in Melbourne
He has many happy memories of your home country!
Many of your posts have really helped me to better understand the culture. I also share many of the same views that you do about the things you like from Indian culture (such as the unitedness of Indian families). I actually like that people are always thinking of each other and feel a greater sense of responsibility towards their families and that parenting is more hands on.
Last year I visited Mumbai a couple months after my husband and I got married so we could see his grandparents and so they could meet me. His family is pretty cool so everyone accepted me with open arms.
It was an unforgettable experience and really opened my eyes to how far his family has come and how hard they have worked to get where they are today. I had the full India experience during my visit—the beds, the Indian bathroom, the sweltering heat. I can honestly say I had never felt more alive than when I visited India–does that sound weird? I have to say that I really admire the leap you took in leaving the comforts of your old Western life to take on the life you have today. It seems like you have totally followed your heart and that it has led you to a lot of fulfillment–even if there have been bumps along the way.
Also, I wanted to let you know that from reading your initial posts to your more recent ones, I can clearly see how much you and your writing has matured. You must be so amazed when you reflect and look back at who you once were and who you’ve become.
Anyways, I just wanted to let you know I appreciate your blog and read it regularly. It’s helped me immensely and it’s also nice to read other stories from other women in intercultural marriages/relationships as I don’t have anyone in my day to day life who I can relate to when it comes to all this.
Hi MrsW, thanks for your lovely long comment and sharing so much about your life. It’s not strange at all that India makes you feel so alive — it has that impact on many people, me included. I think it’s because there is so much going on — all the five senses get awakened and stimulated.
Yes, India sure is an eye opener. There is so much to be learned from what people have gone through in their lives. Even with my own Indian family, and how my parents in law came to Mumbai with nothing and achieved so much (including raising and educating five children) through sheer hard work. I have huge respect for them.
Anyway, I’m really happy to know that my blog has been helpful for you. I appreciate your positive feedback about my writing too!
Hi, Sharell.
I want to thank you for your thoughtful and incisive review of my book, Seeing, Knowing, Being. Your reactions to it resonate deeply with me, since I see in my own life a clear parallel to what you have experienced in moving to India. From 1967 to 1969, I was an American Peace Corps volunteer assigned to work in community development projects in western Nepal. I lived in Surkhet, which at that time, was only a small village almost completely untouched by the outside world. It was a dramatic break from the life I had led growing up in the United States, and entailed changes in virtually every aspect of my life – city traffic, car horns, TV, fast food, busy schedules and deadlines, were exchanged for trekking, cowbells, chai, dal bhat, buffalo milk, kerosene lamps, mountains, and a breathtaking canopy of stars at night. The people in my village were warm and welcoming, and quickly drew me into their extended family – everyone was little sister, uncle, grandmother, older brother, etc. and every morning began with namaste. I developed a deep and abiding friendship with them, eventually spoke fluent Nepali, and spent what proved to be two of the best years of my life there. And as you noted in your own experience, this period of my life yielded a remarkably fresh view of who I was and what I believed. It was a unique opportunity to step back, and put everything in perspective – recognizing the cultural conditioning so apparent in my attitudes, biases, values, and goals in life. There may be no better way for a person to recognize the happenstance of who they are and why they see the world as they do. The most fundamental realization concerned my childhood religion. The exclusionary nature its claims, and assertion of a monopoly on spiritual truth proved no longer tenable. In those two years I was able to see with dramatic clarity that we are One. While the physical and cultural circumstances were profoundly different, it was abundantly clear to me that people are people, reflecting every strength and frailty, kindness and cruelty, wisdom and foolishness, that is found in the land of my birth or anywhere else in the world. It was decades later before my spiritual quest began, but I never forgot what I learned during those two years in Nepal and it is hopefully reflected in my book.
I might add that during that time, I was able to periodically travel by train through parts of India, and absolutely loved it. It offers an incredible kaleidoscope of cultural diversity unlike any other land I have ever visited.
Nice to see you commenting here. I am in good company of people now.
Hi John, what a lovely surprise for you to stop by here. Thanks so much for commenting. I did find the bit about yourself and your journey in the book’s introduction very interesting (and yes, I could relate!) — I’m always fascinated by people’s experiences and their influences. So glad that you wrote the book and shared your insights with us.
Two writers interacting.
O
/ \ Time for me to move.
L L
Hi Sharell, A great post! And the photo you’ve used at the top is so perfect! It speaks a thousand words!
I’m an Indian living in the ‘West’ at the moment, and I think about this a lot. Your post on this and on individual-v-collective culture were really thought-provoking. Thank you
“I’d love to know what you’ve learned this year.”
“DO YOUR BEST, AND LET THE REST GO.”
This year, I’ve learned that there are many answers within myself. At one point in time, I used to get bogged down by the questions and kept looking for external sources to help me resolve those. I used some such sources, found all answers to what once, seemed like concerns / questions. Yet found no peace in them. Then, I began looking inwards and find that I’m at peace with myself and all that surrounds me. I have not changed one bit as a person – just my perspective. Feeling Blessed.
its fine for india to have spirituality as something to offer itself and to foreigners, but now i genuinly feel that indians should concentrate more on practical fields that can put India in the league of competent nations. this includes research and development in science and y=technology, engineering, biotech, medical field, weapons industry and then development of sports, disease eradication, innovationetc. india should focus more towards things that yield true results at the same time, retaining its core good values that make others like india
typing error- its” technology”
They are not mutually exclusive.
Hi Sharell, Good post. Happy Guru Poornima to you as well! If you send me your email, I would like to share a book with you called “Nirvana: Absolute Freedom”. Thought you would like it. There is nothing new you will learn from the book, but the book is just a reminder of what we already know in our heart to be true. If you send me your email address, I would like to share the ebook with you if you are open to reading it. Namaste! Kannan
Thanks Kannan!
I’d be delighted to receive and read the ebook. You can send it to the email address on my contact form. http://www.whiteindianhousewife.com/contact/
Great! I just emailed you a copy. Do check your junk mail folder if you see it missing in your inbox. Namaste!
Well, an adult can become capable of seeking higher levels for himself and spiritual enlightenment only when he has had a strong grounding as a child in the form of security,education ,love and control.This is possible only when the child had a strong family and a functioning society around him.And for this to happen there has to be cultural conditioning and religion in the picture which brings the necessary controls and discipline without which the society would become chaotic! Just adding my two cents to the topic!
I am sure you would have heard of Valmiki, Dhruva and few other sages who were from dysfunctional families, and yet they seeked out and attained enlightenment.
Most of those who take this path, tend to go against the wishes of their families, including Prince Sidharath.
Many of the hippies who come to India, in search of spiritual salvation are not from functional families.
Spiritual quest is a very individualistic decision and path. It calls from detachment from society and the family.
All you need is that moment of realization and higher consciousness. And that can come to any human being.
Continuing with the above discussion, here I would like to tell another story of Narada and Vishnu.
Narada asked him, what is Maya (illusion) ?
Vishnu did not reply, gave his usual smirk and went on for a walk on the Earth. He told Narada to bring some water, as he was thirsty.
Narada went to nearby village, was smitten by the village belle at the village well. He married her. They had kids. There was a flood in which Narada lost his wife and kids. He was mourning, when Vishnu appeared and asked for water again. Narada mourned, for which Vishnu replied “That was maya”
Hindu spirituality sent a message that life on earth is an illusion, family the maya driven attachments that keep you from walking on the path of spiritual enlightenment.
The drive of the individual’s spiritual quest was more important.
I had a childhood friend, Hamalaatha Marje. Her grandfather was a jain monk. He gave up his family life and her grandmother had tough time bringing her father all alone.
Spiritual quests breaks family, and probably why it was pushed to back seat for centuries.
The stage of Sanyaas where you detach and vanaprasth, where you relinquish your control of the family, move on after passing the mantle to the next generation.
You are talking of exceptions like Valmiki that can occur.Iam talking about normal things twhere it is harder for a child from a dysfunctional family compared to a normal one.Hindu religion advises sanyas only after the individual has fulfilled his responsibilities and duties in the normal life.I was reading that Infosys founder Narayanmurthy is trying to lead the final stage of sanyas life at his home.
The core message of Hinduism is “Do you duty” and for most of people its based on concept of karma. Work is worship.
It has prescribed four stages. And expects one to be a good student with his complete focus on learning during Bramhacharya stage. Its expects them to be good husband and father during grahasth stage.
As mentioned above posts, there are many routes for spiritual salvation.
But the same religion also considers family ties as Maya or illusion that can act detrimental to a man breaking up from his ties and venture onto his spiritual path.
If our society was based on these principles, then every father would be working to empower his son and daughter and slowly detach from the family and retire for spiritual quest.
But that’s not whats happening. Example – Political leaders are hanging and would preferably rule from their dead bed to ensure that their family ties based dynasty continues. This is applicable for all spheres of social, economic and political landscape.
We no more do our duty without thinking about fruits of work or karma, we rather expect fruit (bribe) to be present before we do our karma or duty (work)
Your premise that a man or woman have to be conditioned in a functional family set up is not correct. Any human being is capable of walking that path.
One of my mother’s cousin whom I have never met, but have heard his story. He was the silent or different as a child, especially in ultra emotional and violent community. It was times of scarcity and poverty and this boy ran away from the family. he came back after ages as a Sadhu. He was taken by someone at Allahbad and now could chant hymns.
My mother and other closer relatives call him poli samiyaar (fake guru). He has set up an ashram near Bodi – theni area of tamilnadu. One of his disciple or visitor happens to be Illayaraja.
Those who are part of a controlling family, are not allowed to be lean towards spirituality. My family did not allowed me to join Viveknanda college near Madurai, as they feared I would go on the path spirituality very early on my life. This is the college run by Ramakrishna mission, and you can wear only dhoti and flip flop.
Quest for spirituality is not dependent on the circumstances in which the person is raised. it depends on when he becomes ready, when that moment hits him. And when the disciple is ready, teacher finds him to lead on the path. All one needs is the desire to seek. And that desire can come to any human being.
Don’t make things very complicated ! Cultural conditioning and religion bring aspects like love and affection between people which is also important and necessary for people to survive.I repeat it holds true for most normal people in the world.Spiritual quest comes later !
Cultural conditioning and religion builds community! And yes, for a social creature like human being, its important that he loves in a social community. That is the only way he can survive.
Love and Affection comes from cultural conditioning and religion! Really! I thought all the hatred in the world has origin in cultural grouping and religion, though religion may preach peace, love and affection.
Love and affection comes from goodness of human beings, its inbuilt human quality of empathy that generates love and affection.
Even a character like Tarzan and Mowgli are capable of love and affection. Religion or cultural conditioning has nothing to do with it.
It is however important for creating social order and community.
And yes, spiritual quest is for those whose basic Safety and self esteem needs (From Maslow hierarchy of needs) are fulfilled, and they get actualized by this quest.
And you are right, most of us are fighting to get lower level needs . The lower level needs are -
Physiological needs
Safety needs
Love and belonging
Esteem
Spiritual quest is for those who have fulfilled these needs and are in the zone of self actualization. Ever wondered why Princes like Mahavir and Budha went to seek spiritual quests?
Because they had crossed the basic levels, and were in the self actualization need.
And yes, not everyone reaches that zone. In a sense you are right that spiritual quest comes later!
“Spiritual quest is for those who have fulfilled these needs and are in the zone of self actualization. Ever wondered why Princes like Mahavir and Budha went to seek spiritual quests.”
You mean to say that we can go to spiritual quest only after we become millionaires???
And just in another paragraph you say-
“I am sure you would have heard of Valmiki, Dhruva and few other sages who were from dysfunctional families, and yet they seeked out and attained enlightenment.”
Its contradictory. Please make up your mind first what you want to say.
Oh Boy! Maslow hierarchy of needs is just a framework to look at human behavior on the basis of hierarchy of needs.
And no, a person may skip one or two levels and being the actualization zone.
Spiritual quest is for those who are in their ‘Self Actualization’ zone. They may skip lower level of needs, if they have reached there.
Vivekananda was in is self actualization zone very early in his life and used to get into trance while meditation as a kid. He jumped straight into that level.
But in normal life, Bill Gates become altruistic after reaching zenith of his material life. There are no more forts to be conquered. Ratan Tata is now talking about retirement and getting into social work.
And these men are expected to get into self actualization zone.
And Every human being is actualized for something different, something that makes them alive as a human being.
Hope that clarifies.
@Vinod. How can anyone who knows India still believe in Maslow hierarchy of needs ? Everywhere you look you see poor people doing art and meditation ! And it is now widely accepted that meditation and spirituality heal from many physiological and psychological illnesses.
I am not sure about poor people doing meditation unless its makes them part of some community they want to be.
Yes earning livelihood through painting hoardings or ancestral sculpting, is very much part of basic safety needs. Its work for them!
My mother’s cousin who ran away from home and grew up in some Ashram at Allahabad, that’s also safety need for survival.
And its rare when person does what actualizes him as his work! Those are the lucky ones, and they present all over the globe.
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs has loop holes, and further behavioral models have been proposed. But it sure suffices most of time.
Great point.
Maslow hierarchy of needs and all that intellectual hierarchy is just an attempt to regularize a diverse and uncertain human life and its secrets.
Nobody needs to be rich to be spiritual.
Sorry Vinod, I disagree. And the way some people who live in the west not only don’t practice spirituality (which is their own choice and not my problem) but try to convince everybody else you must be spoilt or mad or stupid to practice art/spirituality, annoys me no end. I’m not saying this for you, I have many friends who say this.
Just watch simple women doing kolams in the streets every morning, it’s a pure selfless act of creativity/spirituality/gift back to nature.
Some other psychological theories suggest if you are not being creative somewhere in your life then you must be somewhat ill (like the vast majority of humans). If psychology is tying you up then the theory must be wrong and should be changed IMO
Padparadscha,
“simple women doing kolams in the streets every morning” is a Brahmin conspiracy against the untouchables to suppress them and impose their Brahminaical tyranny on the true oboriginies of India..the Dalits…for which the “social egeletarians” heart bleeds everytime they see the Kolum!
;p
If you ask me there is not much difference across societies, be it west or east, depending on the stage of their evolution.
Growing up, one could see that polarization in the class room. There would be one group who would wear vibuthee on their forehead. Some considered that being fashionable, especially to get favorable impression from teacher and would wear talcum powder as vibuthee as it would easily get wiped.
Then there would be a group, who would be aping the film stars, do punk and do things that according to them is being fashionable.
In west, I have seen the same polarization. A church going group as against a non church going group.
A man makes statement by affiliating to a group about himself, and most of things that you have mentioned is more of a ritual or perception management about self.
I agree, its heavenly to walk early morning, when your see women sprinkling their courtyard, making kollams. The sounds of Subh Prabtham or kandar Shasthi in the background and the air permeated with aroma of coffee.
But kollams are made out of an habitual ritual! I have seen women cribbing about doing this every morning, and they have to do it for the perception management. The woman in the household makes a statement by doing it. It would be a wonderful spiritual experience if done properly. Earlier days, kollams were made of rice powder and ants were supposed to eat it. But now they use chemicals which would kill ants!
The way Indian society has evolved is totally different from how west has evolved. The underlying rule for happiness has been defined differently in both societies affected by the dominant religions practiced by them.
Indian doctrine is that contentment is happiness. Its a state of primarily mind. Thus it preaches control of senses.
Western doctrine is that wealth gives happiness. Its more of a body driven state. Thus it favors pleasure of senses.
Indian society was primarily agrarian economy based society, and surplus was created by consuming less. That has been the guiding force behind Indian philosophy.
Western society has undergone paradigm shift, and its philosophy is primarily guided by Industrial economy. You need to consume more to get greater scale of manufacturing, which also reduces your cost of manufacturing and procurement.
I would not mind an Indian practicing rituals, meditating and spiritually focused, if he is not corrupted by jealousy and the competition with others for resources. The woman who makes kollam and does the morning spiritual routine should not fight with her husband for a bigger color TV because the neighbor has it!
Similarly, if a westerner is happy by all the high materialistic consumption life, there is no issue at all. Why should he feel decadent and sinful after all the consumption?
The point is that there is no fixed route for pursuit of happiness. I would go by Budha’s middle path, a blend of materialism and spirituality.
Please correct me if I am wrong but aren’t kolams done in the hope that the Divine will bless the home & family?
@ Tamasha
Kolams are thought to bestow prosperity to homes. Every morning in Tamil Nadu, millions of women draw kolams on the ground with white rice powder. Through the day, the drawings get walked on, rained out, or blown around in the wind; new ones are made the next day. Every morning before sunrise, the floor of the owners house, or where ever it may be, is cleaned with water and the muddy floor is swept well for an even surface. The kolams are generally drawn while the surface is still damp so that it is held better. Occasionally, cow-dung is also used to wax the floors. In some cultures, cow dung is believed to have antiseptic properties and hence provides a literal threshold of protection for the home. It also provides contrast with the white powder.
Decoration was not the sole purpose of a Kolam. In olden days, kolams used to be drawn in coarse rice flour, so that the ants don’t have to walk that much for too long for a meal. The rice powder is said to invite birds and other small critters to eat it, thus inviting other beings into one’s home and everyday life: a daily tribute to harmonious co-existence. It is a sign of invitation to welcome all into the home, not the least of whom is Goddess Lakshmi, the Goddess of prosperity. The patterns range between geometric and mathematical line drawings around a matrix of dots to free form art work and closed shapes. Folklore has evolved to mandate that the lines must be completed so as to symbolically prevent evil spirits from entering the inside of the shapes, and thus are they prevented from entering the inside of the home.
3×3 dot all and only symmetry 9 Goddesses Swastika Kolam with a single cycle by Nagata S, each of which is corresponded to one of the nine Davi of the Hindu or the nine Muses in Greek
It used to be a matter of pride to be able to draw large complicated patterns without lifting the hand off the floor standing up in between. Powdered white stone (வெங்கசங்கள் பொடி / மொக்குமாவு) was used for Kolam. The month of Margazhi was eagerly awaited by young women, who would then showcase their skills by covering the entire width of the road with one big kolam.
Vinod-
Do you think the drawing of kolams is a spiritual practice?
If it is simply done for the hopeful benefit of divine favor or to ward off evil, I wouldn’t call it ‘spiritual.’
To me spiritual practices are those which are intended to develop an individual’s inner life.
@ Tamasha
I agree, that’s why I prefer to call it a ritual with religious inclinations, not a spiritual endeavor.
Folks do confuse Religious rituals with spiritual processes.
If Hinduism is spirituality, then Kollum is also spirituality. Hinduism is a way of life.. and Kollum is part of that way of life…like Yoga is. No?
But for the ones who love to package Hinduism is nothing more than “Caste and curry”, they would then have to strip “The Surya namaskaram” from Yoga and call it “exercise” and “Kollum” is a bit of art class in the morning.
“ritual with religious inclinations, not a spiritual endeavor”
OMG I have heard it all!
Er… coming back to Maslow vs kolams…
my point was that for Maslow first you eat and make sure you are secure (well-off ?) and only then would you give time to creation/spirituality.
IMO creativity is a celebration of the dance of life, so it’s a form of spirituality. In temple the other night I had a brainwawe watching the priest arrange flowers for the deity and clean the space after ritual. The priest was all to his work and it was a pleasure to watch his delight. “That’s IT, that’s IT !!!”, I kept thinking. “How did the Hindus figured this out thousand of years ago and we still wear grey suits and live grey lives and keep silent in grey churches ?”
Tamasha, of course making a kolam is spiritual, because it is a beautiful gift to people and animals. IMO it is like the prayers the Muslims write in sand or the Tibetan sand mandalas. IMO spirituality is expressed as much in prayer as in everyday little things.
Then sorry Vinod but to me as one teacher says “meditation is a succession of insults from the ego point of view” and the point is to live everything counsciously, not to pretend you are a perfect being with no greed, no anger and no lust
Manny you are really funny
Sorry Sharell for the long tirade, I got carried away
Lets take Mallow’s hierarchy of needs at its face value.
Can we then say, a society that wrote the philosophies of the Rig Veda (Vedanta’s) and Upanishads must have been very content folks..(3000-5000 years go).they had a roof over their heads and enough to eat? while the Barbarians of the rest of world were killing one another for food and shelter? And that todays poverty of India has nothing to do with Hindu Dharmic values and its something other than Dharmic culture of India?
Or does such sentiments rankle the “social egalitarianism” of India today?
LOL
@ Pad
If you read my earlier comments, then you would see that Maslow hierarchy of needs is just a simplified framework. And one can skips the levels of needs and can up in the higher level of needs. Limitations of Maslow hierarchy of needs are documented and improved behavioral models suggested.
Creativity induced karama or activity can be construed as a spiritual process, as its akin to a meditation, a state where human mind is focused on one object. Similarly an Athlete’s focused activity, where the world fades around him and his focus is only on what he is doing is akin to a meditation and would be construed as karma yoga.
Hinduism is pure sense preached doing focused karama, and imagine what it would translate into. A happy hardworking men creating wealth for the society.
So yes kolam making ritual or activity will give inner peace to a woman based on this analogy, if done with purity of though and not cribbing in the process, not corrupted by feelings like pride and jealousy.
@PAD
But if the same thing is done over and over, and man attains a state, where his focus can drift, his thoughts not focused on the activity…..then that activity ceases to be a ritual.
If work or karma does not induce total concentration and focus, if the person loses his control on thoughts, then that is not a spiritual state.
Padparascha-
The Tibetan sand mandalas are a meditation on impermanence (a central teaching of Buddhism) which is why they are ultimately swept up & placed into a running body of water. This promotes ‘inner development’.
If Kollams are done as a gift to people & animals and/or in the hopes of gaining divine favor and/or in the hopes of deterring ‘evil spirits’- how does that promote ‘inner development’?
“Folks do confuse Religious rituals with spiritual processes.”
Seems like people are trying to convey that wine is more classy than beer.
Religious ritual -
1) A man sitting in the sunday mass, not listening to any word spoken by the bishop and lost in his thoughts.
2) Babble of temple goers chattering and gossiping on the temple premises, and few cooking sweet pongal or sacrificed chicken/ goat outside temple premises as the crowd have their picnic!
Spiritual experience -
1) A painter or poet deeply focused and has channeled his thoughts that would eventually result in something creative.
2) A man, like Vivekananda meditating on a rock in middle of an Indian ocean
3) A man sitting on the beach, and enjoying beauty of the nature, the sunset….the waves and contemplating in a singular thought direction.
“Seems like people are trying to convey that wine is more classy than beer.” Chanakya, I totally agree with you.
Tamasha and Vinod you convey a typical laic/intellectual western argumentation about spirituality/religion/creativity. Do you really think a person who is doing everyday a work of art that is anihilated by people walking by has no personal reflection about impermanence ? Or are you trying to convey the idea that there are spiritual efforts that are more worthy than others ? Or you are trying to convince yourselves that it’s no use starting a real meditation practice since you experience pride and jealousy (like everybody else including famous monks and gurus) ?
To me spirituality has more to do with heart than brain, and the older I grow, the more I am impressed by the simple et gentle practices, you know the kind of things your grand-ma would do and never boast about but that changes the World. Well that’s my way at the moment at least
@ Pad
I know that its not possible for everyone to attain nirvana like Budha. Even he had to take many births and use his collective leanings of many birth to attain Nirvana. That’s the lesson that state of Nirvana or perfect harmony is near impossible.
I am discussing as what constitutes as a process of controlling thoughts vis a vis something that has religious connotation but not necessarily spiritual.
Art is a creative process, and yes it can be spiritual.
kolam making can be spiritual, but not under certain circumstances – examples
when woman is drawing a small kolam, a repetitive one, for which she does not have to extract any focus or creative juices
When woman looks at the neighbor’s kolam and tries to outdo her by drawing something bigger or elaborate.
And no, I am not stating that Spiritual quest is superior need than man’s need for community.
I am just stating that true spiritual moments are those that focus on control of ones thoughts, and inward focus to connect to oneself.
Read moments…..not permanent state. Only few can attain a permanent state of being connected to themselves all the time and be ecstatic state of self discovery on the assured path of salvation.
So the daily ritual of calling for early morning prayers at the local Mosque and the five times a day ritual of Namaz towards Mecca is not Spiritual.
Neither is the ritual part of going to Church on Sunday mornings.
The Catholic priests ritual of baptising a child nor any of those rituals are spiritual.
Me sitting on the beach, and enjoying beauty of the nature, the sunset….the waves and contemplating in a singular thought direction of that girl in a Bikini…
Now that is spiritual!
Oh that depends on how Sathvic your thought process is!
if you are admiring the female form without any guilt or tamsic thoughts, its akin to a sculpture carving a nude apsara on the temple wall, or a renowned painter painting a nude model.
Everything is in the thoughts!
Satvik…Yeah..thats the word I was looking for.
My thoughts on buxom women in a bikini are always like that.. .. Satvik, Pure…. Always!
Thats my story and I am sticking to it.
Thats Rubbish !
Nobody can see a lady in swim-suit in satvik manner. What are you going to thin while seeing at her? Oh how motherly or sisterly she is looking? Or how beautiful is that woman? Satvik is nothing but devoid of pleasures. If you are having pleasures it can not be satvik.
You are Tamsi, manny.
Regarding the nature of spirituality, I found this article saying that according to recent scientific studies practices of compassion such as tonglen seem to activate the area of the brain associated with reward :
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Stanford-studies-monks-meditation-compassion-3689748.php#page-1
wonderful post
simply marvelous as Richie Benaud say
but what exactly being ourself or myself means i heard it from numerous foreigners.
We share the same spiritual views, Sharell
Didn’t realise you’ve learnt Reiki.. That’s amazing. I am still on level one of Reiki.. have you learnt distant healing yet?
Hi Manali, yes, I’ve done level 2 as well.
So glad to come across a like minded person!
Spirituality can not be separated from religion. Spirituality is nothing but a more individualistic form of religion. Both have same objective. To attain highest consciousness. And most importantly spiritualism has come out only from religion. If there was no religion there would not have been any spiritual BS.
Chanakya,
Please try to remember that some people hold dear their own forms of Spirituality or Religion and while you may not subscribe to it or any religion for that matter, we must all try to respect it. Calling it BS is not a form of respect.
I won’t let any further comments like that through. I posted this one from you so that I could speak to it.
Thanks,
Shiriki Tauro
Blog/Forum Moderator
Sorry,
But you clearly failed to get my idea. Please don’t be over sensitive. Regarding my comments not being published this is nothing new. There are at least 15 harmless comments of mine in moderation que. Its’s your right which I won’t challenge.
BTW what happened to free speech now.?
Thanks,
Chanakya,
Free Speech is allowed but everything has a moderation. In this case, this blog belongs to Sharell and she has asked that everyone who comments does so with regards and respect to the others who come and read or comment on this space. You need to understand that.
This is your sentence:
I didn’t misunderstand that and I’m sure no else would either. We all know what BS stands for and you are applying it to Spirituality.
As to your comments in moderation….well there must be a reason for this, don’t you think? We’ve been over this before…Sharell and I decide what get’s posted on this blog and by whom. You are more than welcome to argue this with us privately if you feel a particular comment was not posted that should have been but there will be no further discussion of this on the comments section.
Thanks,
Shiriki Tauro
Blog/Forum Moderator
I won’t discuss it with you neither here nor in private. Because it would not be conclusive. I am no politicians so I would move on.
Sorry, If I troubled you this morning.
Shiriki, you seem to let a lot of Vinods posts through. I want to make you aware that much of the information that he posts here on Hinduism is OPINION, although he portrays it as fact. I have no doubt some of it comes from regional Tamilian Hinduism as well. But by letting him post his opinionated “Hinduism” and not letting others post theirs you are showing some definite anti-Indian bias.
Thanks.
prithviraj33,
The difference in what he posts and what you post is how he gives his opinion. Which means that he generally isn’t very aggressive nor does he often disparage other’s. Hence, his posts get through.
If yours are not getting through, then perhaps you should take a look at how your write what your opinions are? You can send us a private message if you wish to discuss this further but no more comments about this will be let through.
Also, as we’ve stated over the past year…it really is up to Sharell and I who and what we let through.
Thanks,
Shiriki Tauro
Blog/Forum Moderator
Not sure, why you came to that conclusion!
There are many techniques in Budhism to alleviate one’s focus from his or her suffering. There are many techniques of meditation and also to activate one’s chakras.
These are not copyrighted by any religion. Any Guru can take those techniques, modify them according to their audience.
One can be spiritual but not religious.
OSho’s meditative techniques focuses on “nothing”. Some focuses on the Chakra around pituitary gland. How are these religious?
@sharell Do you really find Hinduism to also carry a ‘I’m superior to other religions vibe’ ?
I’m not really sure. I think it depends. Some branches of Christianity seem to consider themselves to be superior – it’s my “way or the highway” kind of thing. Alternatively, some strict Hindus (vegetarians etc) seem to consider themselves to be particularly “pure” compared to others. Hinduism as a religion seems to be quite gentle to me. Yet, I think that if I was to try and become a Hindu, I don’t think I would ever be readily accepted as one by Hindu Indians. So, I don’t think it’s a particularly welcoming religion to outsiders.
“So, I don’t think it’s a particularly welcoming religion to outsiders.”
And isn’t it the best thing in Hinduism? Suppose if Islam and Christian were like that there wouldn’t have been any bloody religious wars. Christian would be Christians, Muslims would be Muslims and Hindus would be Hindus…
On a more accurate note, though some Hindus would not consider you one of them after embracing Hinduism but then there is no authority in the Hinduism to decide on it. Once you proclaim you are Hindu, you become Hindu. So you would be fine.
Until I start trying to go to temples.
I even know of some white Hindus in the US who visit Hindu temples, and the people there are not welcoming. It’s more like — “you’re white, why are you coming to a Hindu temple? You can’t be Hindu”.
I know *some* NRIs sucks more than native Indians. They have more of this insecurity scheme.
The reason I can think of this is that the concept of conversion is still an alien idea to Indians and Hindus. We generally believe that you are born to XYZ so you would be XYZ automatically. Also some of us think that a white is automatically Christian. So a rare sight of white person going to temple may surprise or irritate such people and forced them to think- Why are they here ? Why are they doing this drama? Why are they showing off as Hindus when after some time they would be changing their religion like they change their partner?
And last but not least. Our Cultural Superiority over whites.
How dare you to enter in our temples. You meat-eaters and beer guzzling don’t have any right to be here.
Hi Sharrell,
You can practice certain aspects of Hinduism like Vipassana and Yoga and still retain your original religion. However, religions like Islam make it precondition to convert. This more like “My Way or the Highway”. Thanks your stars you have to deal with Hinduism.
In fact its MY WAY OR NO WAY ! in the case of Muslims.
I have observed that most of social and cultural issues in India by expats are discussed from Hinduism point of view. Nobody talk about Islam in India. Even Muslims won’t discuss it. Even Tamasha won’t discuss it, being such a bold and frank lady.
In Mecca and Madina non-muslims are not allowed even to enter the city. How to justify such thing? A verse from the quran which supposedly says to not let non-believer come near the Maszid-Al-Haram which is in the city of Mecca.
Now how Maszid became the whole city?
Hinduism is far tolerant. We let you in at every temple expect some.
Chanakaya-
You wrote & I quote-
‘Nobody talk about Islam in India. Even Muslims won’t discuss it. Even Tamasha won’t discuss it, being such a bold and frank lady.’
Under which post of Sharell’s on this blog would it be appropriate to talk about Islam?
None, as far as I can tell.
Also every time the topic of Islam is brought up you usually fly into one of your infamous tantrums- please spare us all that misery.
“Under which post of Sharell’s on this blog would it be appropriate to talk about Islam?”
Even Sharell is scared of writing anything on Islam or Muslim societies in India.
“Also every time the topic of Islam is brought up you usually fly into one of your infamous tantrums- please spare us all that misery.”
Please give one example.
@Chanakya, what? I don’t know where you came up with that idea from. I don’t write anything about Islam because I don’t know anything about it and it doesn’t interest me.
Chanakaya-
The first time you ever directed a comment towards me it was a boorish, histrionic diatribe on how Muslims are murderers & so on.
boorish- crude, insensitive, ill mannered
histrionic- overly dramatic, theatrical
Now you’ve been warned by Shiriki not to continue your boorish behavior on this blog such as calling someone’s idea of spirituality ‘BS’.
Please learn from your mistakes & apply that knowledge to your posts.
Yes this is true, especially in north Indian temples. But this is mostly retaliatory action. Hindus and Sikhs are not very welcome in the white/black churches in the US.
To be fair, I have not experienced much of this. Indian Hindus have generally been welcoming of me into my Hindu religion. What they are not welcoming of is intercultural marriage, and this is a common thing globally, across religions, cultures and ethnicities.
So while I am accepted as a fellow religious practicioner, there is no doubt that many of them would have issues with me dating or marrying their daughters. Its not a religious bias, its a cultural, racial bias and it is found in other religions and amongst atheists as well.
Don’t you go to temples then Sharell ?
Not regularly.
In response to this sentence
“Yet, I think that if I was to try and become a Hindu, I don’t think I would ever be readily accepted as one by Hindu Indians”
I found that I was considered a hindu automatically once I married my hubby.
I guess it differs from place to place. from temple to temple.
Hi Sharrell,
I wanted to ask whether govt officials get govt accommodation and official cars in Australia. Here, in India a big govt. officials is more less a king. I believe that govt officials in Australia, American and England are lot less privileged that officials in India.
That’s correct, they don’t get the same privileges as Indian government officials. The Prime Minister gets a house and car while in that role (and certain ongoing privileges after leaving the role, including free travel). Ministers have an official car. That’s about it, I think. Politicians are not treated as VVIPs like in India. They are also held very much accountable for their actions, and people with criminal records are prohibited from being politicians.
Poor fellows, the lead a under privileged life. They definitely are unaware of rights and privileged. I think the politicians and bureaucrats in India must have done something good in their previous births.
I don’t agree. Government officials are not king in India. They get lowest wages and cheapest accommodation(If they are lucky). The carze for government job is for stability and unlimited scope for- Upari Income.
I hope you are not confusing government officials with politicians. Politicians are a world apart. They are given extra ordinary perks and authority over ordinary citizens, which is not justified. Even the children of former PM gets so much of privileges that it does seem like a political kingdom rather than a democracy.
On the ‘security’ of Rahul Gandhi, 60 Crores annually are spent. Who is he? Just an MP. But why is he so scared ? Is he more important than the ordinary citizens ? Constitutionally YES !!
All fault lies in our Constitution as this was made to serve purpose of British Officials so their Indian counterparts retained all those clauses which would benefit them as the new rulers of country.
Australian government officers and politicians are paid well. A simple manager (with a professional qualification, such as accounting) in a government department would be earning around $80,000 per year! More senior managers could earn $100,000. Hence, lack of prevalence for dirty deeds to get their hands on extra income, like in India.
Hi Sharrell,
I think many people in India have this misconception that Govt servants are lowly paid in India. This was true in 1980. They are actually better off than people in the private sector at this moment after the the pay commission, however, the inflation is making things worse. Inefficiency, corruption yes, but lowly paid no. People are corrupt in govt. officers for a variety of reason, one being that certain offices like transport and excise which are public dealing departments, are traditionally lucrative and dens of corruption. This has not nothing do with pay. People in higher posts indulge in most sophisticated form of corruption. Anyway, corruption is is institutionalized in India.
My dear Chankya, I was talking about the top most officials and not the lowly babu. The lowly babu does not come into the reckoning at all. The govt. servants do get a decent income these days (you are referring to 1970s and 1980s perhaps) and as far as upaki income is concerned, there are few places where public dealing takes place which are lucrative. The vast majority of govt servants are doing their job diligently.
The Australian Prime Minister gets paid nearly $500,000 per year!
Ministers get a base salary of nearly $200,000.
You can check out all their entitlements here: http://www.remtribunal.gov.au/federalparliamentarians/default.asp
Indian Prime Minister gets paid around $ 35,000 /Year. That’s less than 10% of Australian Prime Minister’s annual salary.
But wait that’s because of purchasing power parity.
I am also not talking about lowly Babus. I am talking about the most highest administrative position like IAS.
IAS salary structure consists of four Pay Scales: Junior Scale, Senior Scales, Super Time Scale, and Above Super Time Scale. Each of the pay scale further consists of different pay bands.
Junior Scale
Pay Band: Rs 15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 5400
Once you start out as a new IAS recruit this is what your salary will be. !
Senior Scales
(i) Senior Time Scale
Pay Band: Rs 15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 6600
An IAS Officer is promoted to the Senior Time Scale usually after 7-9 years of service.
(ii) Junior Administrative Grade
Pay Band: Rs 15600-39100 Grade Pay Rs 7600
(iii) Selection Grade
Pay Band: Rs 37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 8700
Super Time Scale
Pay Band: Rs 37400-67000 Grade Pay Rs 10000
Apart from this basic salary IAS are given cheap accommodation and car. and other free travels.
Now consider these salaries with private companies and its nothing in comparison to them. But still you wouldn’t find an IAS who is not crorepati. Suck is the corruption level.
If you add up the cheap accommodation and other perks, it is more than what a private person gets plus the authority and the hidden incentives which come with the entitlement of the post.
I know you are talking about the sixth pay commission. But even after the recommendation of tht commision, salaries in government sectors are no match for private salaries. I always deal with government officials. A GM level rank officer in a company like BHEL with 30 years of experience gets only 35,000 salary. While a fresher in MNC gets 50,000 INR.
So its not a misconception but a reality that government officers are not paid accordingly. Similarly there are many private sectors where wages are low.
Spirituality, philosophy, religion, these are the things that India is known for and dare I say, the things India does best. Yet why are so many Indians ashamed of their greatest export?
I’ve converted to Hinduism and in my opinion it should be the default global spiritual approach for all cultures worldwide because it is so open and encompassing, unlike Islam and Christianity, which for some reason have captured the imagination (and the heads that go with it LOL) of the planet. The intellectual rigor and diversity within Hinduism cannot be beat.
I am so happy to see that Yoga, Vedanta and other Hindu schools of thought are gaining serious ground globally. Indians should be happy about that too, and when I say Indians I mean ALL Indians, including those who are not Hindu.
Be proud of the diverse intellectual and spiritual accomplishments of your ancient culture, people! Preserve it and pass it on or else we in the West will and might beat you at your own game!
Not sure if people in the west would help preserve these Dharmic values or not…but I see the future where Hindus would be kicked out of India by the “Social egletarians” … where Hindus would have to live like Jews pre Israel without a homeland under the kindness of strangers elsewhere.
Indians are ashamed of it because it is the reason we were slaves for 1,000 years. Hinduism in its ancient form was not all about ahimsa,yoga and meditation. There were specific mentions of eating meat, shastar vidya and the Kshatriya lifestyle. Unfortunately only Rajputs and Sikhs keep this alive to this day.
Also I find it hard to believe that westerners will ever beat Indians, Middle Easterners or Asians at Spirituality. Western culture is getting ever more focused on sex, bigotry (against immigrants), and violence (drone attacks, domestic shootings). The fact is that we were creating cities and laws while most of Europe was in caves painting their faces.
Oui! I totally favor the drone attacks.. That’s a good way to attack the terrorists whithout getting killed yourself on the ground. Why should anyone put soldiers on the ground if you can get them from afar?
I still miss my little village In kerala. It was a contrast to the urbanised portion of my state. Whenever as a Child I visited that place, the solitude was refreshing.
I loved when the Monsoons arrived. When the frogs would start croaking and the insects would come flying out of the ground. The whole place would be filled with these things. Just for that one day they can mate, lay eggs and then die. The morning after, the porch of my Uncle’s hoouse would be littred with the corpses of these insects.
I always thought, this is pretty much the circle of life illustrated in one single day. The emerging of these insects from the ground when the rain hits. The ,mating and reproductive aspect of it. and then these insects die, providing food for the scavengers and the predators.
My life in Kerala made me appreciate nature more I think. because after I left, the ponds have been drained, the trees chopped and the village is now an ugly town with poor planning and infrastructure.
The whole experience showed me that nature is brutal. Beautiful yes, complex yes, but brutal and ugly too.
@Ravindran Nair. What a poetic post ! I also saw these kind of insects as a child in France, living near a river. One of the things that impressed me was learning from my parents that the insects lived a long time underwater and only had one day in the air : another lesson from nature is that not everything is revealed to everybody at once. You need patience and attention to understand Reality.
I just want to say I love your blog. It brings to me the smells and flavors of home in this faraway land. Everytime I read a post of yours I want to send you a virtual hug.
Gurupurnima is something I have always cherished as a ritual in my life. I would take the time to thank the teachers that have taught me so well. In the subjects of their field and otherwise – taught me to be a graceful person, to be calm under pressure, to be honest and most of all, be true to my self.
Lovely blog entry.
Hi Abhipsa, thanks for reading and for your lovely message.
I’m glad I can bring a bit of brightness to your day. Your blog looks like it’s off to a great start. Can’t wait for more entries as it sounds like you have really interesting perspectives to share. By the way, Global Desi is the name of one of my favorite clothes brands in India. It’s a cool name!
Thanks Sharell!
I try
I didn’t know about the brand before I started my blog. Shows how much I know about the new India so to speak. I just thought of what describes me best. I hope to get at least somewhere near being regular with blog entries.
I come from small town India so I’m still not completely aware of all the great new brands that have sprung up. Whenever I go back to visit, which I do often, I still usually shop at the old markets and the local boutiques. I enjoy that.
Let me give you the basic foundation on which the concept of Indian spirituality is laid. Once this basics is known, then anyone can customize and build his own spiritual program on this knowledge.
There are two core focus area for spirituality -
1) Increase your consciousness (chethana)
2) Control your thoughts.
These are two things on where naturally entropy increases. Man tends to run away into his escapade from reality or be the slave of the wandering restless mind.
Its necessary to increase the intensity of your consciousness, to make one feel alive. There are techniques to do so, It essentially advises focus on the senses – the sounds, the sensation of air on the skin. Some even focus on pain to heighten consciousness and feel more alive.
In this context, I remember an example of a white boy beaten by a white mob, when they ran gray hound buses with mixed crowd in the south. The bloodied white boy, felt spiritual, focusing on his pain, empathizing with pain of Jesus Christ.
The western lifestyle focuses and facilitates one to move away from heightened consciousness.
The benefit of this heightened consciousness is that man tends to be more instinctive, sensitive to the environment. At times he can also get premonitions , an awareness to read the program that tuns him.
Other fundamental rule is to control ones thoughts. This also is possible by many techniques. One has to look at his or her thoughts to be able to control them.
the technique could be to attain a state of thoughtlessness or to focus thoughts on ones breath or some divine light or object.
This drives man to choose his controlled responses to the stimuli or circumstances thrown by the environment.
First principle makes one more instinctive, more alive
Second principle gives more control, and does not let the man react instinctively.
Once you know these two principles, you can devise and customize your own spiritual program. We Indians get this message again and again, subconsciously. But we would rather be swayed by the religious rituals.
And no, to know those techniques, you don’t have to be religious.
Imagine a water lake on the high mountain valley at Himalayas. The water should be still. There should not be any bubbles coming to the surface from deep within.
The lake should face the open environment, be in harmony with the nature, and yet choose not to form ripples on its surface due to this interaction with the environment.
Any endeavor to attain this kind of state is spiritual
Manasa, Vacha, Karmanaa is the backbone of the Indian Spiritual guide.
Thoughts are the seeds of our speech and actions. If you control thoughts, you control the speech and actions, thereby controlling your destiny.
Our ancestors had developed techniques like Kundalini, which focus on control of para sympathetic system.
Parasympathetic nervous system is based on nerve rich ganglions on the either side of spinal cord. This forms part of semi autonomous nervous system. there are certain instinctive reactions where the message need not be to the central brain for decision making. These nerve ends make the instinctive decisions, bypassing brain, in certain cases.
chakras of bodies associate with these nerve ends.
its remarkable that seers were able to determine points that control and relaxes nerve ends, brain and hormonal system controlled by pituitary gland.
“Manasa, Vacha, Karmanaa is the backbone of the Indian Spiritual guide.”
Where is the proof of this? Do you have any references or links?
Read Books like “Monk who sold his Ferrari” or books by shiv Khera and Osho.
Or listen to Gurus preaching.
Or just Google.
Osho is an expert on Hinduism now?
Again please post some links. There are many things you post here which are just your opinions and you pass them as fact.
Have you read Geeta? And no I am talking about spirituality, not religion. He is an expert on spirituality.
Are you?
I have been saying that spirituality and Religion need not go together. Why bring Hinduism here? And yes, its all my opinion, just like you opine about white women, Sikhs, Rajputs and America!
Yes I have read large portions of the Gita, Rg Veda and Guru Granth Sahib.
I am not interested in Oshos views on Hinduism. His lifestyle went directly against Hindu ideals and values. He had palatial compounds, rolls-royces and other luxuries were in contrast with his preaching.
Please stick to your topics, one minute you say Indian spirituality than you say what does Hinduism have to do with anything. Obviously you don’t understand Hinduism if you have to ask this question.
Indian spirituality does not mean Hinduism. The basic founding concepts might have been borrowed from religious philosophies.
But I am discussing about the spiritual techniques evolved by many gurus. And these techniques can be practiced by anyone. Its not necessarily religious.
What is wrong in experiencing luxuries of life? Why should it be wrong? Why being rich and successful is a akin to a sin? Who said that? And why should I agree?
When material things are your goal, you have certainly failed in the spiritual world. I think Christians, Hindus, Muslims, Buddhists and Jews can all agree on this.
Not really.
Why had been Church amassing material wealth and political power through out its history?
Why do Jews have a reputation of controlling world banking system?
Hinduism asks men to focus on acquiring material wealth and pleasure during grahhasth ashram stage of life. A stage when they should fulfill their duty towards their children’s and wife’s economic security.
Jains have been known to be ruthless businessmen and have been known to keep their spiritual path different from the business path. I have read about Jains operating slaughter house!
There is no reason to associate sin with wealth, especially when you can use that state to further your actualize your existence.
Its a difference between theory and practical use. What theoretical physicists do is totally different from how that theory is actually used to harness its use in real life. And every theory has set of assumptions or conditions for it to work.
Similarly, these gurus have developed practical techniques for spiritual salvation despite decadence that conditioned value system infuses in any individual.
The alternatives are -
1) Adopt practical spiritual techniques and mitigate the decadence that creeps in due to conditioned value system
2) Or change the value system , thereby mitigating the associated dissonance that sets in.
3) Do both.
As far as my personal opinion is concerned, if church can accumulate material wealth by fulfilling demand for need for religion and salvation from sins, then any individual can also accumulate material wealth by fulfilling demand for spirituality.
His wealth is also a tangible indicator for effectiveness of his techniques or spiritual teaching. market is not stupid and pays for the service only is the customer is satisfied.
Not really?
The Bible – “Do not lay up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moth and rust destroy and where thieves break in and steal, but lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth nor rust destroys and where thieves do not break in and steal. For where your treasure is, there your heart will be also.”
The Rg Veda – “One who helps others wins true wealth. ”
Baghvad Gita – “Which is as poison in the beginning,
but is like nectar in the end; that
is declared to be “good” pleasure,
born from the serenity of one’s
own mind. That which is like nectar
in the beginning from the connection
of the sense-object with the senses,
but is as poison in the end, is
held to be of “passion”. ”
Quran – “The preoccupation of abundance [in material wealth] diverts you [from higher things]”
Buddhist scripture – “I’ve got children’, ‘I’ve got wealth.’ This is the way a fool brings suffering on himself.
He does not even own himself, so how can he have children or wealth?
Surely, the path that leads to wordly gain in one, and the path that leads to Nirvana is another; understanding this, the Bhikkhu, the disciple of the Buddha, should not rejoice in worldly favours, but cultivate detachment. ”
Guru Granth Sahib – “O mortal, why are you so proud of small things? With a few pounds of grain and a few coins in your pocket, you are totally puffed up with pride. Even if you control a hundred villages with great pomp and ceremony. Even if you have an income of hundreds of thousands of dollars. The power you exert will last for only a few days, just like the green leaves of the forest. No one has brought this wealth with them, and no one will take it with him when he dies. Emperors, even greater than Ravan, passed away in an instant. The Lord’s devotees are steady and stable forever; they worship Him, adore Him, and chant the Lord’s Name. Those who are mercifully blessed by God are given the chance to join the company of holy. Mother, father, spouse, children and wealth will not go along with you in the end. Kabeer says, meditate on God. Your life is uselessly wasting away”
As for your comments about Hinduism pushing men to acquire personal wealth and “pleasure” during a specific stage of their lives, I completely disagree. The holy texts of Hinduism definitely disparage materialism. I don’t know much about Jainism and quite frankly I disdain it completely as a useless sect which has done little for India. I definitely have lived against spiritual ideals for many years, but if I were to become interested in them Osho would be the last place on Earth I would look.
Good to hear your opinion on the matters of materialism by different religions
Don’t you think its a hypocrisy when religion preaches collective humility and suffering and creates and institution that does exactly opposite of it?
Is it ok to question scientific theories and push that on an evolution curve of increased awareness, but keep religious theories inflexible and present them as a dogma that can’t be questioned!
Let me give me you an excerpt of Hinduism’s approach to the matters of Purusharth and karma.
There are always assumptions associated with any theory.
Accumulation of wealth is bad if it is driven by greed and kills the man’s ultimate goal of salvation.
Hinduism has defined four objectives in life
“Artha (Devanagari: अर्थ) is a Sanskrit term meaning “purpose, cause, motive, meaning, notion, wealth, economy or gain”.
It refers to the idea of material prosperity. In Hinduism, artha is one of the four goals of life, known as purusharthas. It is considered to be a noble goal as long as it follows the dictates of Vedic morality. The concept includes achieving widespread fame, garnering wealth and having an elevated social standing. It is the second of the four purusharthas, the other three being dharma (righteousness), kama (physical or emotional pleasure) and moksha (liberation). Artha is one of the dharmas (duties) of a person in the second stage of life, the householder stage, and during this a person must accumulate as much wealth as possible, without being greedy, to help and support his family and to be able to give to noble charitable works.”
Since you insist on link, read this
http://www.hinduwebsite.com/hinduism/h_aims.asp
Even religious theories have assumptions around it.
What about a man who is accumulating wealth without greed, is detached and doing altruistic work and also seeking his spiritual salvation.
Why should they be mutually exclusive?
Why success an wealth should be projected as evil?
Human society needs more successful people as role models. There is no need to promote collective suffering and misery in the name of any religion.
How is this my opinion? I posted quotes from various religious texts.
Honestly I’m tried of arguing this with you. Most religions were created before before there were any “institutions”. Institutions are created by men and sometimes they use them for their own personal benefit.
Of course, it is your opinion, for you choose to pick only those texts or concepts from the book that suited your pre existing belief. Just like how I pick those texts and concept that suits my point of view and opinion. That’s how human mind is programmed!
I am not at all tired of arguments and discussions, for they are only means of agitating collective thought processes and get exposure to new perspective. Personally, it opens up my mind further.
There are many cults and belief systems in the world at any point of time. Let me take the belief system followed by Charles Manson and his followers. Why do you think only few belief systems gain enough momentum to propagate in the Human societies?
Its belief that pre existed and not religion, Institutions is what transformed that belief system into a religion.
How did little known belief system of Christianity evolved as a dominant religion of the west?
A little known group of early group of Christians suffered greatly under consecutive Roman Emperors. They became scapegoat of Nero’s machination and were tortured, torn to pieces in gladiator games of Rome.
Any belief system needs a critical mass to survive and propagate. And it needs Power and Infrastructure to propagate. That’s what Institution provides. Christian religion was born during the First Council of Nicaea. Its in this council the gospels were debated, the concept of Jesus was debated, Concept of holy trinity was debated, Concept of church evolved here.
By lavishing state patronage on the Christian Church, he ensured it considerable prestige among those interested in such matters. At the same time, he sent Christians to plunder the treasures of the pagan temples for the state treasury, resulting in humiliation for the pagan priests and the faith itself.
Romans with ambition quickly realized that promotion and success would be facilitated by the, at least apparent, adoption of Christianity. At the same time, Constantine gave the Christian Church the right to distribute state food supplies to the poor, allowing the Church to proselytize to the recipients. Nevertheless, the majority of Romans remained faithful to the ancient religion at the time of his death.
Ultimately the Romans chose to adopt Christianity because they were given no choice. Christianity progressed under an almost unbroken succession of Christian emperors, until it became the official religion of the Roman Empire and then, in 391, the public worship of pagan gods was prohibited. Even so, it took several centuries of oppression before the pagan faith was stamped out, at least in public.
Ashoka and his descendents played the same script and institutionalized Buddhism.
Hinduism, in contrast is not a religion. Its how others called the collective heterogeneous belief system of people who lived beyond Indus River. There is no institution for Hinduism, and the belief system ranges from performing sacrificial rituals according to Vedic texts, Puranas to tribal religions that emphasized on rituals to please spirits, ancestor or nature.
A belief system is endangered, if it under attack and does not have power and is institutions. The invading belief system has to destroy the institution to annihilate it. That’s why Buddhism is not a dominating religion in India, despite it being a major religion once.
Most of the decisions taken at Council of Nicaea to define Christian institutions were influenced by the political reasons. Many version of gospels were burnt (scrolls of Dead Sea were hidden to prevent this) and many aspects of European paganism were inducted and this religion tried to move away from the religion of Judaism.
So the bible was created nearly 300 years later than presumed lie of Christ and the version determined by this council, where the loudest decided the future course of Christianity in the west.
Similarly first Vedas were created around 1500 BC, i.e. roughly 3500 years ago….Vishnu Purana dates around Gupta period.
Interestingly science is also interested in belief propagation. I did come across a belief propagation algorithm. Another interesting field that I have come across is a relatively new field called memetics. This is an evolving field and does give interesting perspective about religion.
“As an enthusiastic Darwinian, I have been dissatisfied with explanations that my fellow-enthusiasts have offered for human behaviour. They have tried to look for ‘biological advantages’ in various attributes of human civilization. For instance, tribal religion has been seen as a mechanism for solidifying group identity, valuable for a pack-hunting species whose individuals rely on cooperation to catch large and fast prey. Frequently the evolutionary preconception in terms of which such theories are framed is implicitly group-selectionist, but it is possible to rephrase the theories in terms of orthodox gene selection.”
—Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene
*Sigh*
Please post some significant quotes from any major LEGITIMATE religion/spiritual belief that advocate materialism and pursuit of wealth over spiritual objectives.
Did you not read about Artha as one of objectives of life, advocated by what would be Vedic Hinduism?
Do you see Lord Vishnu and Krishna a role model wealthy yet spiritual symbols?
And No I am not arguing for Material over spiritual quest at all!
I am arguing for possible co – existence of both. They need not be mutually exclusive.
Here is another from Christian school of theology
“One line of Protestant thinking views the pursuit of wealth as not only acceptable but as a religious calling or duty. This perspective is generally ascribed to Calvinist and Puritan theologies which view hard work and frugal lifestyles as spiritual acts in themselves. John Wesley was a strong proponent of wealth creation. However, to avoid wealth becoming an obstacle to faith, Wesley exhorted his audiences to “earn all they can, save all they can and give away all they can.”[4] Included among those who view wealth as an outcome of faith are modern-day preachers and authors who propound prosperity theology, teaching that God promises wealth and abundance to those who will believe in him and follow his laws.
Prosperity theology (also known as the “health and wealth gospel”) is a Christian religious belief whose proponents claim the Bible teaches that financial blessing is the will of God for Christians. Most teachers of prosperity theology maintain that a combination of faith, positive speech, and donations to Christian ministries will always cause an increase in material wealth for those who practice these actions. Prosperity theology is almost always taught in conjunction with continuationism.
Prosperity theology first came to prominence in the United States during the Healing Revivals in the 1950s. Some commentators have linked the genesis of prosperity theology with the influence of the New Thought movement. It later figured prominently in the Word of Faith movement and 1980s televangelism. In the 1990s and 2000s, it became accepted by many influential leaders in the charismatic movement and has been promoted by Christian missionaries throughout the world. It has been harshly criticized by leaders of mainstream evangelicalism as a non-scriptural doctrine or as an outright heresy.”
Here is one hadith translated from Islam
“The plentiful (i.e., the rich) will be the lowest on the Day of Judgement, except he who distributed his money left and right (i.e., at all times), while he earned from pure (means).”
“The businessmen will be resurrected on the Day of Judgement amongst the sinful (fujjar), except those who have taqwa of Allah, and are honest and truthful.”
“Three things destroy, and three things save. As for the three things that destroy, they are: greediness that is obeyed, and desires that are followed, and a person becoming self-conceited (and proud) with himself. As for the three things that save, they are: the fear of Allah in secret and public, and moderation in poverty and richness, and fairness in anger and pleasure.”
All of those quotes are against materialism.
The first one says only those who give to charity will place high on the day of judgement.
The second one says that businessmen will be resurrected amongst the sinful, except those that are honest and truthful (spiritual objectives like I said)
The third one says that greediness destroys a man as does pride.
You actually proved my point even better, thanks!
“One line of protestant thinking”…
Does not equate to quotes from scripture. You have a really hard time admitting you are wrong don’t you?
I would radially accept if I am wrong. Looks like you don’t want to read the underlying message o my argument.
What is your point? Seeking wealth is wrong.
My point, no it is not wrong if it does not become obstacle to man’s spiritual quest and not driven by greed. A wealthy man need not be gripped by greed or walk in opposite direction from the spiritual quest.
Not sure if you have problem with my English again, or simply no frame of mind to see anything other than what you firmly believe.
An I think for you Hinduism is not a “legitimate religion” which defines Artha as one of the objective of man’s life.
Example – Satha Sai baba.
I did not knew that you were again childishly arguing to win! you want to win? I will concede loss.
Scriptures are also man made, just like constitution of an country.
And I know that few lines of Indian constitution has an underlying meaning!
And this defect in perception is called “Projection”.
Its easy to wake someone sleeping. But its impossible to wake up someone pretending to be asleep.
Similarly, its easy to argue and discuss with someone who is at least listening. But meaningless to discuss anything with someone who is not willing to listen.
Go celebrate your win.
I will celebrate, as you have not given any facts here to back up your claims.
“Artha” can be defined as hard work not amassing wealth, did you know that.
I also have no interest in pakhandi babas like Sai Baba. How many of these babas have sexual relations with their ‘disciples’ both in India and in the West?
I don’t need a mediator between me and god.
My point (It is written above) was when materialism is your goal, you have lost sight of spirituality.
Do you understand my english or not?
I will give one final try.
All scriptures are man made, even concept of god is man made. What is your point in me listing excerpt from those scriptures?
My point is that spirituality and materialism is not mutually exclusive. All your legitimate religions too allow wealth creation if done with noble altruistic intentions, devoid of greed and if it does not become obstacle to ones spiritual quest.
Fine if your opinion works for your spiritual quest.
Why is a spiritual guru indulging in sex is wrong and an individual say “you” indulging in sex is alright?
Going forward, i would know whom to indulge in discussion with.
And debate is usually done in the presence of a judge. You sure can do your celebratory run. But you have proved me right again, that a person sees what he believes. And there is no point in debating with someone as closed as you.
Going forward, your messages will be construed as invitation for debate and will be ignored in absence of a judge. I am here to discuss, not debate.
Have you read Oshos’s books? Or is your perception based on the nudity and free sex that you have heard happening in his Ashrams!
But this reply is for others, who probably have read Geeta and would know the importance given to thoughts, Actions (karma) and Chethana (Consciousness)
Even Vivekananda’s words were to be rise and be conscious.
Some of the sholokas translation from geeta -
One gradually attains tranquillity of mind by keeping the mind fully absorbed in the Self by means of a well-trained intellect, and thinking of nothing else.”
The power of God is with you at all times; through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and emotions; and is constantly doing all the work using you as a mere instrument
One who has control over the mind is tranquil in heat and cold, in pleasure and pain, and in honor and dishonor; and is ever steadfast with the Supreme Self.
The wise sees knowledge and action as one; they see truly
“The mind acts like an enemy for those who do not control it.
Perform your obligatory duty, because action is indeed better than inaction
Sever the ignorant doubt in your heart with the sword of self-knowledge. Observe your discipline. Arise.
Consciousness is eternal it is not vanquished with the destruction of the temporary body
“Delusion arises from anger. The mind is bewildered by delusion. Reasoning is destroyed when the mind is bewildered. One falls down when reasoning is destroyed.
“The power of God is with you at all times; through the activities of mind, senses, breathing, and emotions; and is constantly doing all the work using you as a mere instrument.”
“One gradually attains tranquillity of mind by keeping the mind fully absorbed in the Self by means of a well-trained intellect, and thinking of nothing else.”
“Earth, water, fire, air, ether, mind, intelligence and false ego-all together these eight contitute my separted material energies
“Consciousness is that which is spread all over your body, and is eternal””
What the heck is
Manasa, Vacha, Karmanaa ?
I thought it was the manusmrithi (As per the liberal left Canadian Deepa Mehta)
Didn’t your parents teach you the manusmrithi in kindergarten?
Moderator’s Note: And on that note, that’s enough, I think it’s time for this discussion to be brought to a close. I’m not sure that there’s anything constructive remaining to be said on the matter.